Skip to content

7.3. PED Simulation

seto edited this page Mar 23, 2026 · 2 revisions

Precession Electron Diffraction (PED) Simulation

Simulates diffraction patterns obtained by precessing the incident electron beam around the optic axis.


Overview

In PED the electron beam traces a cone around the optic axis. The diffraction patterns from all beam directions are integrated, offering several advantages over conventional SAED:

  • Dynamical effects are averaged out, yielding intensities closer to kinematical values
  • Higher-order Laue zone (HOLZ) reflections become more visible
  • Better intensity data for structure determination

Settings

Set the beam mode to Precession in Spot property. Dynamical theory is enabled automatically.

Parameter Description Typical
Semi-angle Precession half-angle (mrad) 10–40
Step Number of beam directions sampled 36–72
No. of Bloch waves Bloch waves for dynamical calculation 50–200
Thickness Specimen thickness (nm)

Calculation method

  1. For each sampled beam direction at precession angle α, run a full Bloch-wave calculation
  2. Integrate diffraction patterns over all directions
  3. Project the result onto the detector

Computation time scales linearly with Step.


SAED vs PED

Feature SAED PED
Beam Parallel, fixed Precessing (cone scan)
Dynamical effects Large Averaged, smaller
HOLZ reflections Weak Stronger
Intensity reliability May be insufficient for structure analysis Suitable for structure analysis
Computation time Short Long

See also

Clone this wiki locally