Skip to content

[codex] Extract shared no-provider command helper#158

Merged
svy04 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/duplicate-command-helper
Jun 20, 2026
Merged

[codex] Extract shared no-provider command helper#158
svy04 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/duplicate-command-helper

Conversation

@svy04

@svy04 svy04 commented Jun 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What changed

  • Added a shared quality-command-helpers runner for local no-provider package commands.
  • Rewired the dead-export and dependency-topology product gates to use the shared runner while preserving each gate's own normalize/preview behavior.
  • Lowered the jscpd ratchet from 17 to 16 clone pairs and refreshed the static-analysis remediation queue evidence.

Why

Community feedback called out generated product-script clone clusters and audit surfaces that were too structural. This PR removes the current top jscpd clone pair with focused characterization coverage instead of treating jscpd as an autofix engine.

Validation

  • bun test ./scripts/quality-command-helpers.test.ts ./scripts/product-dead-export-candidates.test.ts ./scripts/product-dependency-topology.test.ts ./scripts/product-script-duplication-audit.test.ts
  • bun run product:static-analysis-remediation-queue
  • bun run build
  • bun run typecheck --pretty false
  • bun run product:quality
  • bun run verify:privacy
  • git diff --cached --check
  • staged diff scan for local paths and common secret token patterns

Claim boundary

This proves one behavior-preserving extraction and a smaller jscpd ratchet. It does not claim broad refactor completion, production readiness, or external validation.

@svy04 svy04 marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2026 01:01
@svy04 svy04 merged commit 53cae3b into main Jun 20, 2026
6 checks passed
@svy04 svy04 deleted the codex/duplicate-command-helper branch June 20, 2026 01:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant