JSON/RPC generic type request/response type to avoid double parsing#101
Merged
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Peter Broadhurst <peter.broadhurst@kaleido.io>
Signed-off-by: Peter Broadhurst <peter.broadhurst@kaleido.io>
onelapahead
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For high performance JSON/RPC heavy applications the two-step parsing in
rpcbackendwhere it uses afftypes.JSONAnythen parses from that into the suppliedinterface{}is inefficient.This can be solved with generic based functions that are typed to the result.
CallRPCTyped- for a single callCallRPCBatchTyped- for a batch of types with the same result typeCare is taken this PR to avoid any interface change on the existing functions, while also striving to avoid code duplication.