BE-419: Fix `cargo publish` failures for darwin-kperf crates by indietyp · Pull Request #8471 · hashintel/hash

indietyp · 2026-02-23T14:44:18Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

This PR standardizes the dependency declarations for darwin-kperf workspace crates by migrating from path-only dependencies to workspace-managed dependencies with explicit versioning.

🔍 What does this change?

Converts darwin-kperf workspace dependencies from shorthand path syntax to full table syntax with version "0.1.0"
Updates darwin-kperf-criterion to use workspace = true for its darwin-kperf-events dependency instead of explicit path and version

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

modifies a Cargo-publishable library and I have amended the version

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

Existing cargo build and test processes

❓ How to test this?

Checkout the branch
Run cargo check to verify dependency resolution
Confirm that all darwin-kperf crates build successfully

vercel · 2026-02-23T14:44:24Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 24, 2026 8:55am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 24, 2026 8:55am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 24, 2026 8:55am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview	Feb 24, 2026 8:55am

cursor · 2026-02-23T14:44:30Z

PR Summary

Low Risk
Primarily metadata/versioning and dependency-declaration changes; risk is limited to build/publish resolution issues if versions are mismatched.

Overview
Updates all darwin-kperf* crates from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1 (including Cargo.lock and the associated package.json versions).

Standardizes workspace dependency declarations by switching darwin-kperf* entries in the root Cargo.toml to explicit { path, version } specs, and updates internal deps (e.g. darwin-kperf-criterion → darwin-kperf-events) to use workspace = true. Also wires crates.io publish metadata by adding shared readme = "../README.md" to the publishable subcrates and updating README crate links to crates.io.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6374031. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

indietyp · 2026-02-23T14:44:33Z

BE-419: Fix cargo publish failures for darwin-kperf crates #8471 👈 (View in Graphite)
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

augmentcode · 2026-02-23T14:46:18Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Standardizes darwin-kperf workspace dependency declarations by adding explicit versions alongside local paths to avoid cargo publish failures.

Change: Updates darwin-kperf-criterion to inherit darwin-kperf-events via workspace = true rather than an explicit path dependency.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

codspeed-hq · 2026-02-23T14:50:01Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 65 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

_{Comparing bm/be-419-fix-cargo-publish-failures-for-darwin-kperf-crates (c57b1ad) with main (bc6e591)²}

12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩
No successful run was found on main (b966a5d) during the generation of this report, so bc6e591 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

…s in README

codecov · 2026-02-23T14:57:34Z

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.59%. Comparing base (bc6e591) to head (c57b1ad).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8471      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   62.59%   62.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1296     1296              
  Lines      131048   131048              
  Branches     5488     5488              
==========================================
- Hits        82032    82030       -2     
- Misses      48106    48108       +2     
  Partials      910      910

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
blockprotocol.type-system	`40.84% <ø> (ø)`
local.claude-hooks	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.harpc-client	`51.24% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`7.78% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.antsi	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.error-stack	`90.88% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-codec	`84.70% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-net	`96.16% <ø> (-0.04%)`	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	`66.80% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	`92.23% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-codec	`72.76% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.86% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-authorization	`62.34% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`27.44% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-store	`37.86% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	`47.95% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-types	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-validation	`83.45% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-ast	`87.25% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-compiletest	`29.69% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-core	`82.32% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-diagnostics	`72.43% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-eval	`69.13% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-hir	`89.11% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-mir	`91.78% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	`94.05% <ø> (ø)`

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with Cloud Agents, enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

cursor · 2026-02-23T15:23:38Z

Cargo.toml

+darwin-kperf                        = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf", version = "0.1.0" }
+darwin-kperf-criterion              = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf/criterion", version = "0.1.0" }
+darwin-kperf-events                 = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf/events", version = "0.1.0" }
+darwin-kperf-sys                    = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf/sys", version = "0.1.0" }


Workspace dependency versions out of sync

Medium Severity

[workspace.dependencies] pins darwin-kperf* crates to version = "0.1.0" while the crates were bumped to 0.1.1, so published manifests that rely on workspace = true can end up depending on the wrong version range.

graphite-app · 2026-02-24T08:46:06Z

Cargo.toml

+darwin-kperf                        = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf", version = "0.1.1" }
+darwin-kperf-criterion              = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf/criterion", version = "0.1.1" }
+darwin-kperf-events                 = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf/events", version = "0.1.1" }
+darwin-kperf-sys                    = { path = "libs/darwin-kperf/sys", version = "0.1.1" }


These workspace dependency declarations specify version 0.1.1 for darwin-kperf packages, but when publishing to crates.io, the dependencies must be published before dependents. The CI pipeline needs to publish darwin-kperf-events and darwin-kperf-sys first (which have no dependencies), then darwin-kperf-criterion, and finally darwin-kperf.

Spotted by Graphite Agent (based on CI logs)

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

graphite-app · 2026-02-24T08:48:18Z

libs/darwin-kperf/criterion/Cargo.toml

 [dependencies]
 # Public workspace dependencies
-darwin-kperf-events = { version = "0.1.0", path = "../events", public = true }
+darwin-kperf-events = { workspace = true, public = true }


This dependency specification causes publishing to fail because cargo tries to resolve darwin-kperf-events ^0.1.1 from crates.io during publish, but only 0.1.0 exists there. The publishing order needs to ensure darwin-kperf-events 0.1.1 is published first, or the dependency should be specified with an explicit version that exists on crates.io.

Spotted by Graphite Agent (based on CI logs)

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

github-actions · 2026-02-24T09:54:00Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$26.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.145 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$12.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 303 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$24.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.70 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 133 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.39 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.79 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.416 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.87 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.285 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.041 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 30.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.825 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.41 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.340 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$3.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.231 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.097 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.266 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.451 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.037 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.754 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.63 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.383 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.528 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 11.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.568 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$2.95 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.651 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 9.65 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.163 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$2.84 \mathrm{ms} \pm 14.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.631 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.34 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.888 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.92 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.812 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.17 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.790 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.27 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.023 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.14 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$39.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$76.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 465 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.045 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$44.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 191 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.92 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$46.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.363 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$54.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 385 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$40.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 181 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$418 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.15 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.897 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$94.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 514 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.313 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$85.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 422 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.793 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$315 \mathrm{ms} \pm 931 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.491 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$14.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.244 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$15.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$15.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 97.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.199 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.81 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.506 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 78.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 89.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.030 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$15.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 77.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.627 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$22.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 144 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$30.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 321 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.536 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.288 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$29.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 239 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.004 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$30.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 301 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.700 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 266 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.779 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 285 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$30.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 308 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.959 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$8.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.127 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$88.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.832 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$138 \mathrm{ms} \pm 721 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.549 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$95.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 574 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$112 \mathrm{ms} \pm 666 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.888 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 568 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.418 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$87.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 529 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.354 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$93.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.171 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$102 \mathrm{ms} \pm 452 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.885 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 551 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 606 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.608 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$136 \mathrm{ms} \pm 602 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 541 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 498 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.229 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$619 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.55 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}4.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

fix: assign concrete versions to packages

1d3af06

graphite-app bot assigned indietyp Feb 23, 2026

github-actions bot added the area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) label Feb 23, 2026

augmentcode bot reviewed Feb 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 23, 2026 14:46 View deployment

chore: adjust README.md location for darwin-kperf-criterion and friends

23049c0

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 23, 2026 14:50 View deployment

chore: bump versions and add crates-io links instead of relative link…

954078f

…s in README

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/infra Relates to version control, CI, CD or IaC (area) labels Feb 23, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 23, 2026 14:55 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 23, 2026 14:56 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 23, 2026 14:56 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 23, 2026 15:06 View deployment

chore: update package.json

6374031

cursor bot reviewed Feb 23, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 23, 2026 15:24 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 23, 2026 15:30 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested review from a team and removed request for a team February 23, 2026 15:42

fix: version inside of workspace deps

c57b1ad

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 24, 2026 08:44 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 24, 2026 08:45 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 24, 2026 08:45 View deployment

graphite-app bot reviewed Feb 24, 2026

View reviewed changes

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 24, 2026 08:55 View deployment

Comments

Conversation

indietyp commented Feb 23, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔍 What does this change?

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

indietyp commented Feb 23, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 23, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

cursor bot Feb 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Workspace dependency versions out of sync

Uh oh!

graphite-app bot Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

graphite-app bot Feb 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 24, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

vercel bot commented Feb 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Feb 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading