[ENG-126] Fix range bug

[trangdoan982]

https://www.loom.com/share/444edb44d9344f5eab46b20200cbf56c

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • When adding a new attribute block, both "options" and "range" sections are now included by default.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update modifies the logic for creating new attribute blocks within the AttributeConfigPanel component. Specifically, the handleAddAttribute function now generates two child nodes—one labeled "options" with an empty text child, and another labeled "range" with no children—when a new attribute block is added. Previously, only the "options" child node was included.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
src/features/attributeSelect.tsx	Updated handleAddAttribute to create both "options" and "range" child nodes for new attributes.

Poem

A bunny hopped through code today,
Adding "range" where options lay.
Now each attribute, fresh and new,
Has siblings—yes, not just a few!
With options and range, side by side,
The panel's logic takes a stride.
🐇✨

Tip

⚡💬 Agentic Chat (Pro Plan, General Availability)

• We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments and issue comments, within and outside of PR's. This feature enhances review and issue discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments and add commits to existing pull requests.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7069543 and 2a0fceb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/features/attributeSelect.tsx (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

src/features/attributeSelect.tsx (1)

342-345:

Details

✅ Verification successful

Excellent fix for the range bug!

This change adds a "range" child node when creating a new attribute block, which resolves the bug identified in ENG-126. Previously, only the "options" node was created, which would cause issues when users tried to configure numeric attributes that rely on the range values.

To confirm this fixes all edge cases, we can verify how the range node is used in the codebase:

---

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for all places where range values might be accessed
rg "rangeNode" -A 3

Length of output: 1811

---

Excellent fix for the range bug!
This change adds a “range” child node when creating a new attribute block, resolving ENG‑126. I verified all rangeNode usages in the codebase and confirmed they all live in src/features/attributeSelect.tsx and use safe optional chaining (children[0]?.text, children[1]?.text) to fall back to defaults.

approve_code_changes

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[mdroidian]

"smallest PR for range bug" 😆