Skip to content

DRAFT: [WIP] Toying with the idea of VL exchange#13

Draft
ximinez wants to merge 65 commits into
developfrom
unlsync
Draft

DRAFT: [WIP] Toying with the idea of VL exchange#13
ximinez wants to merge 65 commits into
developfrom
unlsync

Conversation

@ximinez

@ximinez ximinez commented Mar 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner
  • Log Validator Lists received from peers

High Level Overview of Change

Context of Change

Type of Change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Refactor (non-breaking change that only restructures code)
  • Performance (increase or change in throughput and/or latency)
  • Tests (you added tests for code that already exists, or your new feature included in this PR)
  • Documentation update
  • Chore (no impact to binary, e.g. .gitignore, formatting, dropping support for older tooling)
  • Release

API Impact

  • Public API: New feature (new methods and/or new fields)
  • Public API: Breaking change (in general, breaking changes should only impact the next api_version)
  • libxrpl change (any change that may affect libxrpl or dependents of libxrpl)
  • Peer protocol change (must be backward compatible or bump the peer protocol version)

This change is Reviewable

@ximinez ximinez force-pushed the unlsync branch 3 times, most recently from 0f4b828 to a1125a0 Compare March 25, 2025 16:31
@ximinez ximinez force-pushed the unlsync branch 3 times, most recently from 5f42d0a to 874f0b8 Compare April 2, 2025 14:45
@ximinez ximinez force-pushed the unlsync branch 4 times, most recently from 9dee098 to b547a7e Compare April 10, 2025 21:42
@ximinez ximinez added NoCI and removed NoCI labels Apr 11, 2025
@ximinez ximinez force-pushed the unlsync branch 2 times, most recently from 8682888 to c9bbddd Compare April 28, 2025 18:46
@ximinez ximinez force-pushed the unlsync branch 4 times, most recently from cd6f17b to 7509d43 Compare July 18, 2025 22:36
@ximinez ximinez force-pushed the unlsync branch 3 times, most recently from e04c528 to d88440b Compare July 24, 2025 22:25
@ximinez ximinez force-pushed the unlsync branch 4 times, most recently from 238372a to f9fa8e4 Compare August 4, 2025 17:08
ximinez added 30 commits March 6, 2026 13:55
* ximinez/develop: (121 commits)
  fix: Handle WSClient write failure when server closes WebSocket (6671)
  ci: Change conditions for uploading artifacts in public/private/org repos (6734)
  refactor: Rename non-functional uses of `ripple(d)` to `xrpl(d)` (6676)
  refactor: Move more helper files into `libxrpl/ledger/helpers` (6731)
  fix: Minor RPC fixes (6730)
  fix: Prevent deletion of MPTokens with active escrow (6635)
  fix: Clamp VaultClawback to assetsAvailable for zero-amount clawback (6646)
  fix: Add assorted Lending Protocol fixes (6678)
  fix: Change variable signedness and correctly handle `std::optional` (6657)
  refactor: Reorganize RPC handler files (6628)
  chore: Update XRPLF/actions (6713)
  docs: Add explanatory comment to checkFee (6631)
  fix: Decouple reserve from fee in delegate payment (6568)
  fix: Check trustline limits for share-denominated vault withdrawals (6645)
  fix: Remove fatal assertion on Linux thread name truncation  (6690)
  chore: Enable clang-tidy `coreguidelines` checks (6698)
  ci: Allow uploading artifacts for XRPLF org (6702)
  fix: Enforce aggregate MaximumAmount in multi-send MPT (6644)
  chore: Use nudb recipe from the upstream (6701)
  fix: Fix previous ledger size typo in RCLConsensus (6696)
  ...
* ximinez/develop:
  fix: Fix regressions in `server_definitions` (7008)
  chore: Do not duplicate sanitizer flags (7058)
  ci: Run pre-commit on diff in clang-tidy workflow (7078)
  ci: Use XRPLF/create-issue (7076)
  ci: Rewrite clang-tidy workflow(s) in a reusable manner (7062)
  chore: Ignore identifier-naming update in git blame (7066)
  refactor: Enable clang-tidy `readability-identifier-naming` check (6571)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant