feat: Benchmark Quality Gate (M117)#258
Conversation
- QualityGate class in quality_gate.py with YAML-configurable GateConfig - GateCheck, GateConfig, GateResult, GateVerdict Pydantic models - 5 composite checks: min_requests, quality_score, outlier_ratio, convergence, load_profile - Non-zero exit code on FAIL (CI/CD pipeline friendly) - CLI quality-gate subcommand with table + JSON output - Programmatic evaluate_quality_gate() API - 23 new tests Closes #257
hlin99-Review-Bot
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Approved by hlin99-Review-Bot
Idea Value: High — composite quality gate is essential for CI/CD pipeline integration. Combining validation, convergence, outlier, and load profile checks into a single pass/fail verdict is the right approach.
Code Quality:
- Clean Pydantic models (GateConfig, GateCheck, GateResult, GateVerdict)
- YAML-configurable thresholds with sensible defaults
- Good separation: core logic in
quality_gate.py, CLI in_quality_gate.py - 23 tests covering models, config loading, evaluator, programmatic API, CLI, and imports
- Non-zero exit on FAIL is CI-friendly
docs/iterations/current.mdupdated
All 5 CI checks pass. LGTM.
hlin99-Review-BotX
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Approved by hlin99-Review-BotX
Idea Value: High — composite quality gate is a natural CI/CD integration point. Combining validation, convergence, outlier, and load profile checks into a single pass/fail verdict with YAML-configurable thresholds is well-designed.
Code Quality:
- Clean Pydantic models (GateConfig, GateCheck, GateResult, GateVerdict)
- Good separation: core
quality_gate.py+ CLI_quality_gate.py - YAML config with sensible defaults, graceful warn/fail thresholds
- 23 tests covering models, config, evaluator, programmatic API, CLI, and imports
- Non-zero exit on FAIL is CI-friendly
docs/iterations/current.mdupdated
All 5 CI checks pass. Second +1 — ready for merge.
hlin99-Review-BotX
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Approved by hlin99-Review-BotX
Idea Value: Strong — composite quality gate for CI/CD is a natural fit after the benchmark pipeline milestones. YAML-configurable thresholds and non-zero exit on FAIL make it immediately usable in pipelines.
Code Quality:
- Clean Pydantic models (GateConfig/GateCheck/GateResult/GateVerdict)
- Good separation: core logic in
quality_gate.py, CLI in_quality_gate.py - 5 built-in checks with graduated PASS/WARN/FAIL verdicts
- YAML config loader with sensible defaults
- CLI properly registered with table + JSON output
docs/iterations/current.mdupdated- ROADMAP.md updated (M116 ✅, M117 🔄)
- CI all green (lint + tests 3.10/3.11/3.12)
No issues found. LGTM.
hlin99-Review-BotX
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
✅ Approved (hlin99-Review-BotX)
Idea Value: Strong — composite quality gate for CI/CD pipeline integration is a natural next step after convergence/outlier/load-profile analyzers. Clean design combining existing analyzers into a unified pass/fail verdict.
Code Quality:
- Well-structured Pydantic models (GateConfig, GateCheck, GateResult, GateVerdict)
- 5 checks with sensible PASS/WARN/FAIL thresholds and configurable via YAML
- Clean CLI with table + JSON output, non-zero exit on FAIL (CI-friendly)
- Programmatic
evaluate_quality_gate()API with both config-file and kwargs paths - 23 tests covering models, config loading, evaluator, API, CLI, and public imports
docs/iterations/current.mdand ROADMAP.md properly updated
Minor nit: ROADMAP says '~22 new tests' but actual count is 23. Not blocking.
LGTM 🚀
Summary
Composite pass/fail quality gate for benchmark data, designed for CI/CD pipeline integration.
Changes
QualityGateclass inquality_gate.pywith YAML-configurableGateConfigGateCheck,GateConfig,GateResult,GateVerdictPydantic modelsquality-gatesubcommand with--configYAML support, table + JSON outputevaluate_quality_gate()andload_gate_config()APIsCloses #257