Skip to content

Update references to RFC3987 with RDF12-CONCEPTS.#418

Open
gkellogg wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
iri-reference
Open

Update references to RFC3987 with RDF12-CONCEPTS.#418
gkellogg wants to merge 2 commits into
mainfrom
iri-reference

Conversation

@gkellogg

@gkellogg gkellogg commented Aug 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Updates other RDF references to RDF 1.2 versions.
Depends on an update to RDF12-CONCEPTS to export the "IRI reference" term. Temporarily skips the check for consistence of common files.

Fixes #355.


Preview | Diff

Updates other RDF references to RDF 1.2 versions.
Depends on an update to RDF12-CONCEPTS to export the "IRI reference" term.
Temporarily skips the check for consistence of common files.

Fixes #355.
@gkellogg

gkellogg commented Aug 9, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

This is a test of using the RDF Concepts definition of IRI instead of referencing RFC3987.

@dlongley dlongley left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems ok to me -- other than that RDF12-CONCEPTS is still a working draft and these are normative references. I can't recall how we ought to proceed with these sorts of interim changes, so I'm deferring to those more knowledgeable.

@gkellogg

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

The idea of using RDF12-CONCEPTS was to start doing the updates that would naturally come when updating to JSON-LD 1.2, which would come after RDF 1.2. Some of the concepts we need to clarify, such as character space and text direction, are better defined in RDF 1.2, so it makes sense to start updating those references now.

Generally, references can lag, so that as an ED, we can reference WDs. By the time JSON-LD starts going rec-track again, RDF 1.2 should be in CR. Certainly, other necessary updates will be based on changes in RDF 1.2.

@w3c w3c deleted a comment from Blakgirl Aug 29, 2024
@gkellogg gkellogg added the editorial:class 2 Change that do not functionally affect interpretation of the document label Oct 19, 2024
@pchampin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I'm catching up on long overdue PR reviews...
It seems to me that, given the current plan to amend the current REC with class1-3 changes, this PR should not be merged just yet, right?

@gkellogg gkellogg added the defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD label Oct 28, 2024
@pchampin

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I propose to close this PR, as it now conflicts with other PRs affecting common files (and should be rendered moot by w3c/json-ld-wg#170

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

defer-future-version Defer this issue until a future version of JSON-LD editorial:class 2 Change that do not functionally affect interpretation of the document propose closing spec:editorial

Projects

Status: Future Work

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Kill "IRI"?

3 participants