Remove name and email fields

[vojtisprime11]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Refactor
  • Updated user response data structure - the name field has been removed from user API responses.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: ef15ce20-6884-4f9a-b1b2-8816e6b6fb0c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 97860e3 and 8fb8fa0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/types/user.ts

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• src/types/user.ts

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The UserResponse interface in src/types/user.ts is updated to remove the name field, leaving only id and createdAt properties in the exported type definition.

Changes

User Response Type Contract

Layer / File(s)	Summary
UserResponse interface field removal src/types/user.ts	The name field is removed from the exported UserResponse interface, reducing the type to id and createdAt properties only.

Estimated Code Review Effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly Related PRs

• vojtisprime11/BreakShield-test#1: Also modifies the UserResponse interface by removing a user-related field (email), indicating overlapping edits to the same public type.

Poem

🐰 A name falls away, but the user remains,
ID and creation date sustain,
Simpler types, lighter chains—
Breaking down what's not essential gains! ✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Title check	⚠️ Warning	The pull request title claims to remove both 'name' and 'email' fields, but the actual changes only remove the 'name' field from UserResponse. The email field removal is not present in the changeset.	Update the title to accurately reflect the actual changes: 'Remove name field from UserResponse' or verify that the email field removal is included in this PR.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch test-breakshield

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}