Support TC39 decorators#169
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This commit adapts the babel configuration to support the syntax propsed by the TC39 decorator proposal: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators This proposal is now stage 3 (recommended to be implemented). It is likely that this is the syntax that will be used for a decorators for a long time. The syntax is similar (using the @decorator) to the "legacy" decorators so this should be backward compatible with code using the old decorators. Fixes ttag-org#168.
Contributor
Author
|
I just rebased the PR on master now that #171 was merged! |
Member
|
oh, nice! thanks. Will release the new version ASAP |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This commit adapts the babel configuration to support the syntax propsed by the TC39 decorator proposal: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-decorators
This proposal is now stage 3 (recommended to be implemented). It is likely that this is the syntax that will be used for a decorators for a long time.
The syntax is similar (using the
@decorator) to the "legacy" decorators so this should be backward compatible with code using the old decorators.Fixes #168.