docs: add Google Sign‑in UI gate and implementation task#130
Open
tsg21 wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
X-Player) to keep existing API contracts stable during rollout.Description
docs/prd/60-ui-overview.mdto add an "Access and Sign-in Gate" section that mandates Google sign-in before lobby access, describes route-guard behaviour, loading/error states, and the temporaryX-Playermapping.docs/prd/50-api.mdto document the transitional backend auth model that continues to acceptX-Playerwhile noting a future migration toAuthorization: Bearer <token>.docs/prd/06-technical-platform.mdto describe the staged rollout (UI sign-in first, backend token validation later) and reiterate thatusernamemaps to authenticated email.tasks/2026-04-20-google-auth-ui-gate.mdwith a five-step implementation plan, per-step unit/integration test expectations, and explicit scope that backend authorisation is out of scope for this change.Testing
npm run lint,npm run typecheck, andnpm testinfrontend/, anduv run pytestinbackend/when code changes are added.git commitcompleted).Codex Task