Markdown version incorporating Apple's comments#8
Markdown version incorporating Apple's comments#8timfromdigicert wants to merge 4 commits intomasterfrom
Conversation
Many thanks to Ryan Sleevi for doing this conversion.
docs/SMCWG-charter.md
Outdated
| - CA operational practices, physical/logical security, etc. | ||
|
|
||
| The SMCWG needs to exercise caution to ensure that its work product does not | ||
| impede the issuance of certificates with other EKU types. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoiding conflicts is a good idea, but trying to enforce it via vague language in the charter is probably not helpful.
| email address. The key pair can then be used to sign, encrypt, and decrypt | ||
| email. An S/MIME certificate can be identified by the existence of an Extended | ||
| Key Usage (EKU) Object Identifier (OID) of `1.3.6.1.5.5.7.3.4` for | ||
| email address. The key pair can then be used to sign, verify, encrypt, and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/9/files/7d20e6bcfb580b409a37b8f2f1d0b43d6d10e749:
Key pairs can also be used to verify emails.
docs/SMCWG-charter.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| The SMCWG SHALL exercise caution to ensure that its work product does not impede | ||
| the issuance of certificates with other EKU types. | ||
| The SMCWG needs to exercise caution to ensure that its work product does not |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Removed in a later commit.
| * Names and email addresses of employees who will participate in the Working | ||
| Group and Forum as Member representatives. | ||
| * Names and email addresses of designated representatives who will participate | ||
| in the Working Group and Forum on behalf of the Member. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/9/files/7d20e6bcfb580b409a37b8f2f1d0b43d6d10e749:
designated representatives need not be employees.
| Meetings or Teleconferences (not counting subcommittee meetings thereof). For | ||
| transition purposes, if three (3) meetings have not yet occurred, quorum is | ||
| three (3). | ||
| Meetings or Teleconferences (not counting subcommittee meetings thereof). No |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
From https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/9/files/7d20e6bcfb580b409a37b8f2f1d0b43d6d10e749:
Quorum rules are simpler if there are no ballots until quorum is determined. We're unlikely to have a ballot that fast anyway.
| scheduled SMCWG Meeting or Teleconference provided that the proposal is | ||
| mentioned in an agenda circulated on the SMCWG Mail List at least | ||
| forty-eight (48) hours prior to the SMCWG Meeting or Teleconference. | ||
| - The SMCWG may establish subcommittees, by formal ballot, to address any of the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://github.com/sleevi/cabforum-docs/pull/9/files/7d20e6bcfb580b409a37b8f2f1d0b43d6d10e749
Having formal ballots for subcommittees doesn't really slow things down that much, and provides more clarity about what they are for and who is for them.
1 participant
Many thanks to Ryan Sleevi for doing this conversion.