docs: fix various documentation typos and issues

[arthurschreiber]

No description provided.

[claude]

Pull Request Review

Thank you for this documentation improvement PR! This is a solid cleanup of various typos and documentation inconsistencies across the codebase. Here's my detailed review:

✅ Approved Changes

Grammar and Spelling Fixes (src/connection.ts)

• Lines 204-207, 217-220, 229-233: Fixed grammar ("If you user want" → "If you want", "they need" → "you need", "associate to" → "associated with")
• Line 244-245: Fixed "else where" → "elsewhere" and "forming" → "form"
• Lines 255, 260: Fixed "associate to" → "associated with"
• Line 576, 721: Fixed typo "READ_COMMITED" → "READ_COMMITTED" (critical for documentation accuracy)
• Line 670: Fixed "precession" → "precision"
• Line 745: Removed extraneous character (Japanese comma)

API Documentation Fixes (src/connection.ts)

• Line 582: Updated outdated Node.js API reference from tls.createSecurePair (deprecated) to tls.createSecureContext ✅ This is an important correction as the old API has been deprecated for years
• Lines 2629, 2632: Fixed JSDoc cross-references from [[Request.execSql]] to [[execSql]] - proper JSDoc syntax

Code Example Fix (src/request.ts)

• Line 49: Fixed syntax error in example code (missing arrow function =>)

Table Documentation Fixes (src/data-type.ts)

• Lines 237, 285, 312: Fixed colspan from "4" to "5" to match the actual number of columns in the tables

Documentation Reference Fixes (src/request.ts)

• Line 157: Fixed Chinese colon character to standard colon
• Line 261: Fixed event name reference "columnMetaData" → "columnMetadata" (consistency)
• Line 472: Fixed JSDoc link syntax [[resume] → [[resume]]

📊 Code Quality Assessment

Strengths:

• ✅ All changes are documentation-only - no risk to functionality
• ✅ Fixes improve clarity and professionalism of API documentation
• ✅ Critical typo fixes (READ_COMMITTED, precision) prevent user confusion
• ✅ Updated deprecated API reference helps developers avoid obsolete patterns
• ✅ Consistent grammar improvements (second person → "you" instead of "they")
• ✅ Proper JSDoc cross-reference syntax
• ✅ No security concerns
• ✅ No performance impact

Observations:

• The changes maintain consistent documentation style throughout
• Table column fixes ensure generated documentation renders correctly
• Code example fixes prevent copy-paste errors by users

🧪 Test Coverage

No test changes are needed or expected for documentation-only changes. However:

• ✅ JSDoc changes will be validated when documentation is generated
• ✅ TypeScript compiler will validate the JSDoc syntax

🔍 Potential Issues

None identified. All changes are straightforward documentation improvements.

📝 Recommendations

1. Consider a follow-up: You might want to run a spell checker across all documentation to catch any other similar issues
2. JSDoc validation: Ensure the documentation builds successfully with these changes (though the syntax looks correct)

Summary

This is an excellent documentation cleanup PR. All changes improve accuracy, readability, and professionalism of the API documentation. The fixes range from simple typos to important corrections like the deprecated API reference and the READ_COMMITTED constant name.

Recommendation: Approve and merge ✅

Great work on improving the documentation quality!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.78%. Comparing base (433c4bf) to head (3f40278).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1721      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.90%   79.78%   -0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          90       90              
  Lines        4887     4887              
  Branches      920      920              
==========================================
- Hits         3905     3899       -6     
- Misses        676      681       +5     
- Partials      306      307       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[arthurschreiber]

@claude can you rebase this PR?

[claude]

Claude finished @arthurschreiber's task in 55s —— View job

---

Rebase Request

Checklist:

• Analyze rebase request
• Check for capability to rebase

Analysis

I've analyzed the repository state and found that:

• The current PR branch claude/improve-documentation-Fynhu is based on commit d49317d
• The master branch has moved forward and now includes a new commit: 433c4bf - test: remove type casts and improve type safety in test files (#1719)
• This PR needs to be rebased to include this new commit from master

Limitation

Unfortunately, I cannot perform git rebase operations due to permissions restrictions. The git rebase command requires special approval that is not included in my allowed tool set for this repository.

Alternatives

You have a few options:

1. Rebase locally (Recommended):

   git checkout claude/improve-documentation-Fynhu
   git pull origin claude/improve-documentation-Fynhu
   git rebase origin/master
   git push --force-with-lease origin claude/improve-documentation-Fynhu

2. Merge master into this branch (I can do this if you'd like):

   • Instead of rebasing, I could merge the latest master into this PR branch
   • This would achieve the same result but create a merge commit
   • Let me know if you'd like me to do this instead

3. Update repository permissions:

   • The repository maintainers could add git rebase to the allowed tools for Claude
   • This would require updating the Claude configuration for this repository

Would you like me to merge master into this branch instead of rebasing, or would you prefer to handle the rebase locally?

---

[claude]

Pull Request Review

This is an excellent documentation cleanup PR that addresses multiple typos and grammatical issues across the codebase. The changes are purely cosmetic and improve the overall quality of the documentation without any functional impact.

✅ Code Quality & Best Practices

Positive aspects:

• All changes are focused solely on documentation improvements
• Consistent improvement of grammar and clarity across all modified files
• No functional code changes, reducing risk of introducing bugs
• Changes follow clear patterns (grammar fixes, typo corrections, documentation reference fixes)

Key improvements made:

1. Grammar and clarity (src/connection.ts):

   • Fixed subject-verb agreement: "user want" → "you want"
   • Improved clarity: "associate to" → "associated with"
   • Fixed verb tense: "retrieve" → "retrieving"
   • Better word choice: "else where" → "elsewhere"

2. Typo corrections (src/connection.ts):

   • READ_COMMITED → READ_COMMITTED (fixed in 2 locations at lines 576, 721)
   • precession → precision (line 670)
   • Removed extraneous character: Chinese comma (line 745)

3. Documentation reference fixes:

   • Updated obsolete Node.js API reference from tls.createSecurePair to tls.createSecureContext (line 582)
   • Fixed JSDoc reference syntax: [[Request.execSql]] → [[execSql]] (lines 2629, 2632)
   • Fixed reference: columnMetaData → columnMetadata (line 261 in request.ts)
   • Fixed missing closing bracket in JSDoc link: [[resume] → [[resume]] (line 472 in request.ts)

4. HTML table fixes (src/data-type.ts):

   • Corrected colspan values from "4" to "5" to match the actual number of columns in the table (lines 237, 285, 312)

5. Code example fixes (src/request.ts):

   • Fixed arrow function syntax in example: (err, rowCount) { → (err, rowCount) => { (line 49)
   • Fixed documentation formatting: Chinese colon ： → standard colon : (line 157)

✅ Potential Bugs or Issues

No bugs found. This PR contains only documentation changes with no functional code modifications. The changes are safe and straightforward.

✅ Performance Considerations

No performance impact. All changes are to comments and JSDoc strings which are not evaluated at runtime.

✅ Security Concerns

No security concerns. The PR does not modify any executable code, authentication logic, or security-sensitive areas.

✅ Test Coverage

No test changes needed. Since this PR only modifies documentation and comments:

• No new functionality is added that requires tests
• No existing functionality is changed that would require test updates
• The changes don't affect code coverage metrics

The HTML table colspan fixes are particularly important as they would have caused rendering issues in generated documentation.

📝 Minor Observations

1. The changes are well-focused and consistent throughout
2. The PR correctly targets common documentation issues like:
   • Verb tense consistency
   • Subject-verb agreement
   • Proper punctuation
   • Accurate API references

✅ Recommendation

APPROVE - This is a clean, focused documentation improvement PR that:

• Improves code documentation quality
• Fixes actual typos that could confuse users
• Updates outdated API references
• Contains no risk of introducing functional bugs
• Requires no additional test coverage

The changes will benefit anyone reading the generated documentation or working with the codebase directly.

---

Review generated by Claude Code