NL#155
Conversation
|
Is there some way this can be done in the REPL (e.g. using I ask since, in general, the "rule" for puzzlers has been that they are a self-contained piece of code you can run in the REPL. |
|
Rules are made to be broken. Also, it's a chance to branch out into scala script runner puzzlers. |
|
Hey, that's not bad. The text is muddied with alternatives, and in fact it looks better straight in REPL as suggested: This behavior is known but not widely complained about because no one writes comments. |
Deprecation candidate? ;-) As regards the example, is the paste mode version in line with what we'd expect from the original example? The way I was reading the puzzler, that was the version that didn't compile? |
|
It's the same as and you see output right away. I wonder if "Newline Cinema" is still in business? It would make a good title. Also, same behavior in doti! The next edition of the book can have one of those star-shaped stickers: "Certified for Scala 3!" |
Someone said, "I was surprised this isn't on scalapuzzlers.com."
Which should go on the next version of the t-shirt.
I numbered it 26 because sadly, now that scalaz is not in the community build, it will probably never get a puzzler. But on the upside, that is a feature.
I was surprised to find recent commit activity! All that dust must make you sneeze.