[ux] Add missing pipeline groups

[StephenHulme]

FIx the No Pipeline Found text in the purpose context:

Changes proposed in this pull request

• Add missing pipeline groups to the following pipeline configs:
  • bespoke aggregation
  • bespoke hic
  • high throughput anospp
  • high throughput bioscan
  • high throughput custom pool
  • high throughput duplex seq
  • high throughput genotype by sequencing

Instructions for Reviewers

[All PRs] - Confirm PR template filled
[Feature Branches] - Review code
[Production Merges to main]
    - Check story numbers included
    - Check for debug code
    - Check version

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 84.93%. Comparing base (78f5d04) to head (c4fa5dc).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2737   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    84.93%   84.93%           
========================================
  Files          501      501           
  Lines        20598    20598           
  Branches       377      377           
========================================
  Hits         17495    17495           
  Misses        3100     3100           
  Partials         3        3           

Flag	Coverage Δ
javascript	80.25% <ø> (ø)
pull_request	84.93% <ø> (ø)
push	84.93% <ø> (ø)
ruby	92.54% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[StephenHulme]

Interestingly, there looks like another factor at play - when I was taking a before screenshot, I do get a pipeline name:

If I recall correctly, requests, submissions, and child purposes all play a role in this...