Skip to content

Enable autodiff in ci for all major os#152768

Open
ZuseZ4 wants to merge 4 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
ZuseZ4:autodiff-in-ci-for-all-os
Open

Enable autodiff in ci for all major os#152768
ZuseZ4 wants to merge 4 commits intorust-lang:mainfrom
ZuseZ4:autodiff-in-ci-for-all-os

Conversation

@ZuseZ4
Copy link
Member

@ZuseZ4 ZuseZ4 commented Feb 17, 2026

Follow-up attempt to #140064 after moving autodiff to dlopen.

TODO:

r? @Kobzol

@rustbot rustbot added A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 17, 2026
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 17, 2026

Kobzol is not on the review rotation at the moment.
They may take a while to respond.

@ZuseZ4 ZuseZ4 changed the title Autodiff in ci for all os Enable autodiff in ci for all major os Feb 17, 2026
@ZuseZ4
Copy link
Member Author

ZuseZ4 commented Feb 17, 2026

@bors try jobs=dist-aarch64-apple

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2026
Enable autodiff in ci for all major os


try-job: dist-aarch64-apple
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Feb 17, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: f1988f0 (f1988f049b5de890c7b71b3da66d38620ed38fbd, parent: dfbfbf785f46d10103e80735a9ccb4765bd6dfe2)

@ZuseZ4
Copy link
Member Author

ZuseZ4 commented Feb 17, 2026

@bors try jobs=dist-x86_64-linux

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2026
Enable autodiff in ci for all major os


try-job: dist-x86_64-linux
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Feb 18, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 20e4cfa (20e4cfae177c9daec1a6b5ae5d1332821335dcbc, parent: 8387095803f21a256a9a772ac1f9b41ed4d5aa0a)

@ZuseZ4 ZuseZ4 added the F-autodiff `#![feature(autodiff)]` label Feb 18, 2026
@ZuseZ4
Copy link
Member Author

ZuseZ4 commented Feb 18, 2026

@bors try jobs=dist-aarch64-linux

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2026
Enable autodiff in ci for all major os


try-job: dist-aarch64-linux
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Feb 18, 2026

☀️ Try build successful (CI)
Build commit: 22ac1fb (22ac1fb63228652dc40e63504ab188e2bae982bb, parent: 8387095803f21a256a9a772ac1f9b41ed4d5aa0a)

@ZuseZ4
Copy link
Member Author

ZuseZ4 commented Feb 18, 2026

@bors try jobs=dist-aarch64-llvm-mingw

@rust-bors

This comment has been minimized.

rust-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2026
Enable autodiff in ci for all major os


try-job: dist-aarch64-llvm-mingw
@rust-lang rust-lang deleted a comment from rust-bors bot Feb 18, 2026
@rust-bors rust-bors bot added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Feb 18, 2026
@rust-bors
Copy link
Contributor

rust-bors bot commented Feb 18, 2026

💔 Test for ea4964d failed: CI. Failed job:

@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-aarch64-llvm-mingw failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-CI Area: Our Github Actions CI A-testsuite Area: The testsuite used to check the correctness of rustc F-autodiff `#![feature(autodiff)]` S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-infra Relevant to the infrastructure team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants