feat: sketch for a Julia template and MWE#552
Draft
jpbrodrick89 wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
Draft
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #552 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 77.13% 69.63% -7.50%
==========================================
Files 32 35 +3
Lines 4356 4499 +143
Branches 717 745 +28
==========================================
- Hits 3360 3133 -227
- Misses 712 1082 +370
Partials 284 284 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Contributor
Benchmark ResultsBenchmarks use a no-op Tesseract to measure pure framework overhead. 🚀 0 faster, ✅ No significant performance changes detected. Full results
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@dionhaefner I know you're working on your own version of this and I definitely don't want to step on any toes, but I've been playing around with this a bit in the background and thought it better to have in the open to work out what direction we want to go in (both/and is potentially a possibility too). I'm not a Julia expert by any means and this probably needs some more cycles if we go with it, but this seems to work when packages support Enzyme (not all do). Happy to hear how you want play it.
I tried to give an example using a simple linear solver with verifiable gradients that could be useful in a Jax setting as no Jax packages expose modified Cholesky.