Errata#25
Open
gcrick wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
I might be a bit late, but here are a few more corrections. I was confused when I read "Finally, we propose some research challenges: p 1. " on the website, but looking at the source, I suspect that the "p" is an error, and the "1" should be the first list item, so I made that change. After having read the entire article, it reminds me a lot of the model-driven development movement that was popular when I was in university. It sounded very promising at the time, but not much has come of it many years later. The only feedback I can offer on the content itself is that while it offers a grand vision, it doesn't address how to achieve that vision in any concrete way, and it leaves me with many questions. I guess I will have to wait for future articles to find out how domain models can be represented in a dynamic, general, and yet simple and useful way!
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I might be a bit late, but here are a few more corrections. I was confused when I read "Finally, we propose some research challenges: p 1. " on the website, but looking at the source, I suspect that the "p" is an error, and the "1" should be the first list item, so I made that change.
After having read the entire article, it reminds me a lot of the model-driven development movement that was popular when I was in university. It sounded very promising at the time, but not much has come of it many years later. The only feedback I can offer on the content itself is that while it offers a grand vision, it doesn't address how to achieve that vision in any concrete way, and it leaves me with many questions. I guess I will have to wait for future articles to find out how domain models can be represented in a dynamic, general, and yet simple and useful way!