Skip to content

OSDOCS#16913: CQA for oc CLI docs#105823

Closed
bergerhoffer wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-16913
Closed

OSDOCS#16913: CQA for oc CLI docs#105823
bergerhoffer wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
bergerhoffer:OSDOCS-16913

Conversation

@bergerhoffer

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer commented Feb 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Version(s):
4.16+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-16913

Link to docs preview:

Sampling of previews from various distros:

OCP

ROSA

OSD

MicroShift

QE review:
N/A - CQA

Additional information:

CQA for the following CLI assemblies:

  • getting-started-cli.adoc
  • usage-oc-kubectl.adoc

I know this is still an XL PR, but this was about as small as I could break things out for this portion of the CQA story!

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 2, 2026
@ocpdocs-previewbot

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Feb 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🤖 Tue Mar 03 18:21:54 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://105823--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

Comment thread modules/about-cli-profiles-switch.adoc Outdated
[NOTE]
====
If you have access to administrator credentials but are no longer logged in as the default system user `system:admin`, you can log back in as this user at any time as long as the credentials are still present in your CLI config file. The following command logs in and switches to the default project:
If you have access to administrator credentials but are no longer logged in as the default system user `system:admin`, you can log back in as this user at any time as long as the credentials are still present in your CLI configuration file. The following command logs in and switches to the default project:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] RedHat.TermsErrors: Use 'if' or 'provided that' rather than 'as long as'. For more information, see RedHat.TermsErrors.




== Installing the CLI on Linux

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] AsciiDocDITA.AssemblyContents: Content other than additional resources cannot follow include directives.

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-16913 branch 2 times, most recently from 67bc3d1 to aa04943 Compare February 26, 2026 19:12
Comment thread modules/cli-installing-cli-binary.adoc
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-16913 branch 2 times, most recently from f0c23d1 to e9af291 Compare February 26, 2026 19:31
The Kubernetes command-line interface (CLI), `kubectl`, can be used to run commands against a Kubernetes cluster. Because {product-title} is a certified Kubernetes distribution, you can use the supported `kubectl` binaries that ship with
{product-title}, or you can gain extended functionality by using the `oc` binary.
[role="_abstract"]
Because {product-title} is a certified Kubernetes distribution, you can use the Kubernetes CLI (`kubectl`) that ships with {product-title} to interact with your cluster. You can also gain extended functionality specific to {product-title} by using the {oc-first} binary.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 [error] RedHat.TermsErrors: Use 'includes' rather than 'ships with'. For more information, see RedHat.TermsErrors.

@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-16913 branch 2 times, most recently from 3402605 to 07793c4 Compare February 26, 2026 20:14
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer changed the title [WIP] OSDOCS#16913: CQA for oc CLI docs OSDOCS#16913: CQA for oc CLI docs Feb 26, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 26, 2026
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-16913 branch 2 times, most recently from d9aff1d to b44541b Compare March 2, 2026 20:03
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 2, 2026
@bergerhoffer bergerhoffer force-pushed the OSDOCS-16913 branch 4 times, most recently from 7414900 to 249fd94 Compare March 3, 2026 18:08
@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bergerhoffer: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@bergerhoffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/label merge-review-needed

Just need the merge review - I will take care of the merge when ready.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Mar 3, 2026
@kalexand-rh kalexand-rh removed the merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR label Mar 4, 2026
@kalexand-rh

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

We are pausing reviews and merges of CQAs. Please put this back in the queue when we resume CQA merges.

@jeana-redhat

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The branch/enterprise-5.0 label has been added to this PR.

This is because your PR targets the main branch and is labeled for branch/enterprise-4.22. And any PR going into main must also target the latest version branch (branch/enterprise-5.0).

If the update in your PR does NOT apply to version 5.0 onward, please re-target this PR to go directly into the appropriate enterprise- version branch or branches instead of main.

@bergerhoffer

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing in favor of #113944 and #113945

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants