chore: rename configuration language to modeling language#686
chore: rename configuration language to modeling language#686
Conversation
|
matthewpereira
left a comment
matthewpereira
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I have some casing and branding nitpicks.
| link: './configuration-language', | ||
| id: './configuration-language', | ||
| title: 'Modeling Language', | ||
| description: 'Learning about the FGA modeling language', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In docs/content/getting-started/immutable-models.mdx we use {ProductName}, here and in some other cases we use FGA - which do you prefer?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think that Andres strongly prefers {ProductName} because it means the content can be recycled.
| link: '../configuration-language', | ||
| id: '../configuration-language', | ||
| title: 'Modeling Language', | ||
| description: 'Learn about the {ProductName} Modeling Language.', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Elsewhere we seem to use sentence case, but here we use title case. I think sentence case is preferred, what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ideally we would pick one strategy and make it consistent everywhere, but let me know if I'm missing some nuance here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Section titles are going to be sentence case, yes. My plan is to slightly modify our current style guide for FGA purposes.
pavokta
left a comment
pavokta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is a lot of changes but it looks like they were handled honorably!
3 participants
Description
Replaces "Configuration Language" with "Modeling Language"
https://openfga.github.io/openfga.dev/pr-preview/pr-686/docs
References
Review Checklist
main