Open
Conversation
f762b9d to
53a9976
Compare
53a9976 to
f0c0704
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Following a report from @estellebertrand, we use
7.17.24in production. We could revert this change when deploying the8.19.13in production. And then 9.3.2 ?action.destructive_requires_namebecause the cleanup is using*in indices names (not allowed in v8)cardinality(_id)bydoc_countbecause "Fielddata access on the _id field is disallowed, you can re-enable it by updating the dynamic cluster setting: indices.id_field_data.enabled"We use the 7.17 SDK because the CI matrix can't conditionally swap SDK versions per ES version. ES 8 enables security (auth + TLS) by default, which the 7.x SDK doesn't support, so we disable it with
xpack.security.enabled: falseto allow the old SDK to talk to ES 8 without auth.When migrating the server to ES 8 in production: