docs: detailed security rules reference#40
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds
docs/security-rules.md— one section per rule (SwiftLint-Rules.md style): what fires, why it matters (the concrete attack/leak scenario), a bad → good example, and what is deliberately not flagged (the real-world calibration from #38, presented as intentional design).The README's 14-rule table keeps its compact form but every rule ID now links into the reference; anchors verified against GitHub's slug algorithm.
Accuracy reviewed against the rule sources: every Detects mechanism and every Not flagged bullet maps to a specific code guard or named regression test. Docs only — no code changes; suite still green (212).