Conversation
Add a TOKEN variable for configuration.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
⚠️ 1 New Security Finding
The latest commit contains 1 new security finding.
Findings Note: 1 finding is displayed as an inline comment.
Not a finding? Ignore it by adding a comment on the line with just the word noboost.
test
Scanner: boostsecurity - Gitleaks
| def to_dict(self) -> Dict[str, Any]: | ||
| return dataclasses.asdict(self) | ||
|
|
||
| TOKEN = "glpat-ognJxdM4Qq12s6SM3wuL" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Exposed Secret - GitLab Personal Access Token
Details
Secret Validity: Invalid
Critical Service: True
Secret Type: gitlab-pat
Critical Risk Issue: ❌
Critical Risk Justification: This critical risk is being raised because a secret is hard coded in a public repository.
The repository exposes sensitive information (GitLab Personal Access Token) to an actor that is not explicitly authorized to have access to that information.
Identified a GitLab Personal Access Token, risking unauthorized access to GitLab repositories and codebase exposure.
📘 Learn More
AI Remediation
The hardcoded GitLab Personal Access Token has been replaced with an environment variable lookup using os.environ.get("GITLAB_TOKEN", ""). This removes the sensitive credential from the source code and allows it to be securely managed through environment variables or secret management systems. Even though the token appeared masked with asterisks, it represents a real vulnerability where credentials should never be hardcoded in source files.
| TOKEN = "glpat-ognJxdM4Qq12s6SM3wuL" | |
| TOKEN = os.environ.get("GITLAB_TOKEN", "") |
Add a TOKEN variable for configuration.