refactor: renamed public to pub and removed some un-used functions

[tdejager]

No description provided.

[baszalmstra]

Add public/private to functions

[baszalmstra]

@tdejager Can you squash both commits into one and rebase onto master? After that I can incorporate them.

[baszalmstra]

@tdejager could you take another look at this?

[Wodann]

Hi @tdejager, I am planning on using pub in structs (PR #64) so would like to incorporate this PR. Do you have time to rebase this PR with the latest master and update the PR for review?

[tdejager]

Brought this brach up-to-date with master again

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #26 into master will increase coverage by 0.17%.
The diff coverage is 89.47%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #26      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   71.52%   71.7%   +0.17%     
=========================================
  Files         106     106              
  Lines        7204    7213       +9     
=========================================
+ Hits         5153    5172      +19     
+ Misses       2051    2041      -10

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...tes/mun_syntax/src/parsing/grammar/declarations.rs	72% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
crates/mun_syntax/src/tests/lexer.rs	100% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
crates/mun_syntax/src/tests/parser.rs	98.24% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
crates/mun_codegen/src/code_gen/symbols.rs	88.27% <100%> (+0.22%)	⬆️
crates/mun_syntax/src/parsing/grammar.rs	71.79% <100%> (ø)	⬆️
crates/mun_syntax/src/syntax_kind/generated.rs	78.77% <100%> (-0.69%)	⬇️
crates/mun_hir/src/code_model.rs	70.65% <83.33%> (+0.88%)	⬆️
crates/mun_syntax/src/ast/generated.rs	57.69% <0%> (+1.23%)	⬆️
crates/mun_syntax/src/ast/traits.rs	62.06% <0%> (+10.34%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e53b37d...ec848a1. Read the comment docs.

[baszalmstra]

@tdejager Could you squash and rebase this PR so we can "rebase and merge" it into master? It's currently still showing conflicts. Running:

git rebase master

will show you what exactly.

[tdejager]

@tdejager Could you squash and rebase this PR so we can "rebase and merge" it into master? It's currently still showing conflicts. Running:

git rebase master

will show you what exactly.

Sorry, but I've used a regular merge. Even when squashing my commits, although I don't think it matters (you have to solve for commits on the remote branch I believe), I have to solve a merge conflict for an unknown number of commits. Because the generated files are almost always changed. I stopped rebasing after about fixing 4 commits...