store data through connection#9
Open
vavrecan wants to merge 1 commit intomscdex:masterfrom
vavrecan:master
Open
store data through connection#9vavrecan wants to merge 1 commit intomscdex:masterfrom vavrecan:master
vavrecan wants to merge 1 commit intomscdex:masterfrom
vavrecan:master
Conversation
Owner
|
Well, you can already get at the socket object via the intercept method, that would take care of all but the auth part. I guess I could just call the auth callbacks with |
Author
|
but if i pass intercept = true, proxySocket() will not get called - right? |
Can you give an example? I have the same need, I need to get the user information after socks authentication in socks.createServer. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I would like to implement bandwidth monitoring as well as request log.
I need to have some object where I can store current user between different events.
How would you suggest to do it? I think passing socket object to connection event is not best idea - should I create custom extra-data object?
Here is the sample of what I am trying to do: