Update MedPerf Documentation#644
Open
RodriguesRBruno wants to merge 19 commits intomlcommons:mainfrom
Open
Conversation
…lar to what is done in section 4
…te-medperf-docs
MedPerf server and also explicitly mention local test storage
This reverts commit e7f6a0f.
Contributor
|
MLCommons CLA bot All contributors have signed the MLCommons CLA ✍️ ✅ |
This reverts commit b81e581.
Contributor
Author
|
I have reverted the hash changes to |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #635
I did not do changes regarding the packaging scripts due to MLCube support being dropped soon, so I imagine packaging will have bigger changes.
I also noticed a new MedPerf CA cube being introduced with a UID of 1 recently. This changes the UIDs of following cubes for the tutorials, so I updated these. I believe the UIDs will still be used even when transitioning to bare Docker.
Finally, I noticed the image hashes in
seed_utils.pydid not match the hashes of the corresponding docker images in DockerHub, which caused issues when running examples, so I updated the hashes in this file.