Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request adds the documentation structure for MTA version 8.2.0 release notes. Four AsciiDoc files are created or modified: a new assembly file linking release-note topics, two new topic files for features/enhancements and fixed issues, and an update to the master release-notes document to include the new assembly. ChangesMTA 8.2.0 Release Notes Structure
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@assemblies/release-notes/assembly_mta-8-2-0.adoc`:
- Around line 17-18: The abstract currently promises sections not present;
update the role="_abstract" text in assembly_mta-8-2-0.adoc to only list the
sections actually included (new-features and fixed-issues). Edit the line that
begins with [role="_abstract"] / the following sentence so it references only
"{ProductFullName} 8.2.0 new features and fixed issues" (remove references to
Technology Preview, removed features, and known issues) to match the assembly
contents.
- Line 13: Replace the hard-coded heading "= mta 8.2.0" with the product
attribute used elsewhere so the title reads "= {ProductShortName} 8.2.0"; update
the top-level assembly heading in assembly_mta-8-2-0.adoc to use
{ProductShortName} following the same pattern as the 8.1.0 assembly to keep
branding consistent.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 06247b99-210f-4560-8d9c-a57a1094e23b
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
assemblies/release-notes/assembly_mta-8-2-0.adocdocs/release-notes/master.adocdocs/topics/release-notes-topics/ref_fixed-issues-8-2-0.adocdocs/topics/release-notes-topics/ref_new-features-and-enhancements-8-2-0.adoc
| ifdef::context[] | ||
| [id="mta-8-2-0_{context}"] | ||
| endif::[] | ||
| = mta 8.2.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use the product attribute in the title.
mta is hard-coded in lowercase here, while the existing release-notes assembly uses {ProductShortName} for the heading. Switching to the attribute keeps the branding consistent and avoids drift if the product name changes.
♻️ Proposed fix
-= mta 8.2.0
+= {ProductShortName} 8.2.0Based on the existing 8.1.0 assembly pattern.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| = mta 8.2.0 | |
| = {ProductShortName} 8.2.0 |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@assemblies/release-notes/assembly_mta-8-2-0.adoc` at line 13, Replace the
hard-coded heading "= mta 8.2.0" with the product attribute used elsewhere so
the title reads "= {ProductShortName} 8.2.0"; update the top-level assembly
heading in assembly_mta-8-2-0.adoc to use {ProductShortName} following the same
pattern as the 8.1.0 assembly to keep branding consistent.
| [role="_abstract"] | ||
| Review new features, enhancements, Technology Preview features, removed features, fixed issues, and known issues in {ProductFullName} 8.2.0. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Trim the abstract to the included sections.
This abstract still advertises Technology Preview, removed features, and known-issues content, but this assembly only includes the new-features and fixed-issues topics. Either add the missing includes or narrow the abstract so the page doesn't promise sections that aren't present.
♻️ Proposed fix
-[role="_abstract"]
-Review new features, enhancements, Technology Preview features, removed features, fixed issues, and known issues in {ProductFullName} 8.2.0.
+[role="_abstract"]
+Review new features, enhancements, and fixed issues in {ProductFullName} 8.2.0.Based on the existing 8.1.0 assembly pattern, the abstract should mirror the sections that are actually included.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| [role="_abstract"] | |
| Review new features, enhancements, Technology Preview features, removed features, fixed issues, and known issues in {ProductFullName} 8.2.0. | |
| [role="_abstract"] | |
| Review new features, enhancements, and fixed issues in {ProductFullName} 8.2.0. |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@assemblies/release-notes/assembly_mta-8-2-0.adoc` around lines 17 - 18, The
abstract currently promises sections not present; update the role="_abstract"
text in assembly_mta-8-2-0.adoc to only list the sections actually included
(new-features and fixed-issues). Edit the line that begins with
[role="_abstract"] / the following sentence so it references only
"{ProductFullName} 8.2.0 new features and fixed issues" (remove references to
Technology Preview, removed features, and known issues) to match the assembly
contents.
TRACKERS
RNs: https://redhat.atlassian.net/browse/MTA-6490
Attributes:
Summary by CodeRabbit