Skip to content

Actions: microsoft/debugpy

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
1,445 workflow runs
1,445 workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
Close stale 'waiting for response' issues Close stale 'waiting for response' issues #755: Scheduled
12s main
main
12s
Close stale 'waiting for response' issues Close stale 'waiting for response' issues #754: Scheduled
12s main
main
12s
Breakpoints in non-stdlib modules named io.py are always skipped Auto-label when user responds #2037: Issue comment #1887 (comment) created by rchiodo
2s
2s
Breakpoints in non-stdlib modules named io.py are always skipped round-robin #160: Issue #1887 opened by ollie-bell
19s
19s
Add configuration option to issue a SIGTERM (or other signal) when the debugger is being stopped Auto-label when user responds #2036: Issue comment #1818 (comment) created by rubensa
2s
2s
Close stale 'waiting for response' issues Close stale 'waiting for response' issues #753: Scheduled
17s main
main
17s
Set justMyCode from the CLI round-robin #159: Issue #1886 opened by karimknaebel
20s
20s
Is there a way to resume/continue execution for all processes at once after hitting breakpoints and stopping? Auto-label when user responds #2035: Issue comment #1882 (comment) created by rchiodo
3s
3s
Add configuration option to issue a SIGTERM (or other signal) when the debugger is being stopped Auto-label when user responds #2034: Issue comment #1818 (comment) created by rubensa
2s
2s
Is there a way to resume/continue execution for all processes at once after hitting breakpoints and stopping? Auto-label when user responds #2033: Issue comment #1882 (comment) created by tjoymeed
2s
2s
Close stale 'waiting for response' issues Close stale 'waiting for response' issues #752: Scheduled
14s main
main
14s
feat: add monkey_patch_os for posix_spawnp (#1885) Code scanning - action #1535: Commit 644349d pushed by rchiodo
2m 14s main
main
2m 14s
feat: add monkey_patch_os for posix_spawnp Auto-label when user responds #2032: Issue comment #1885 (comment) created by rchiodo
3s
3s
feat: add monkey_patch_os for posix_spawnp Auto-label when user responds #2031: Issue comment #1885 (comment) created by azure-pipelines bot
2s
2s
feat: add monkey_patch_os for posix_spawnp Auto-label when user responds #2030: Issue comment #1885 (comment) created by rchiodo
2s
2s
feat: add monkey_patch_os for posix_spawnp Code scanning - action #1534: Pull request #1885 synchronize by lachalek
2m 25s lachalek:lachalek/posix-spawnp-monkey-patch
lachalek:lachalek/posix-spawnp-monkey-patch
2m 25s
Close stale 'waiting for response' issues Close stale 'waiting for response' issues #751: Scheduled
14s main
main
14s
Memory leak when debugging asyncio.create_subprocess_shell calls round-robin #158: Issue #1884 opened by scztt
26s
26s
Close stale 'waiting for response' issues Close stale 'waiting for response' issues #750: Scheduled
14s main
main
14s
Auto-label when user responds Auto-label when user responds #2029: created by rchiodo
2s
2s
round-robin round-robin #157: opened by psomhorst
15s
15s
Is there a way to resume/continue execution for all processes at once after hitting breakpoints and stopping? Auto-label when user responds #2028: Issue comment #1882 (comment) created by rchiodo
2s
2s
Does anybody know why the BREAKPOINTS GUI PANEL in VSCode is not editable and refinable? Auto-label when user responds #2027: Issue comment #1881 (comment) created by rchiodo
2s
2s
Close stale 'waiting for response' issues Close stale 'waiting for response' issues #749: Scheduled
13s main
main
13s
Code scanning - action Code scanning - action #1532: Scheduled
2m 10s main
main
2m 10s
ProTip! You can narrow down the results and go further in time using created:<2025-03-30 or the other filters available.