feat: support async rules

[mblarsen]

No description provided.

[yudikubota]

Thanks for implementing that feature
Changes and tests are OK
but what you're going to do regarding existing applications?

let's say an application expects boolean to be returned from a can() call. If we change it to async it will return a Promise and can break the existing application.

Are you going to release a separate breaking version?

[mblarsen]

let's say an application expects boolean to be returned from a can() call. If we change it to async it will return a Promise and can break the existing application.

Are you going to release a separate breaking version?

Yeah, that's my concern. I was thinking making a v2.0

I also considered creating a can + canSync version ala the way node fs package works. But that would still require a v2 and I'm not sure it is worth to maintain the extra complexity.

[mblarsen]

FYI, I made an earlier version where there were no changes to can (except I remove the Boolean() calls). That way only some, every was promise based.

The advantage of that is that it wouldn't break any apps. But you, as a user, would have to write checks on the return type. Not interested in that either.

[yudikubota]

Code and tests are OK
just be careful about breaking changes