Solution#3581
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
The code implementation is correct and functional. The only issue is a minor linting violation (trailing blank line) which does not affect functionality. No changes are required to the logic or structure.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your implementation is approved and meets all requirements. The sorted_variables dictionary correctly contains two keys ("mutable" and "immutable") with the appropriate variable objects properly categorized based on Python's mutability semantics. All 8 variables are accurately placed: mutable types include your list, dict, and set, while immutable types include your int, float, bool, str, and tuple. The dictionary structure matches the specification exactly with variable objects rather than names. Great work on getting the mutability classifications correct!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.