-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
fix: drop async-void pipe listener and sync-over-async wrappers #616
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
In modern .NET / WPF, when does TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException fire for a faulted fire-and-forget Task, and is it guaranteed to run before process exit?💡 Result:
The TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskException event is triggered when a faulted Task containing an unobserved exception is garbage collected [1][2]. For a fire-and-forget task, this means the event will only fire after the task has completed with an exception, the task object has become unreachable, and the Garbage Collector (GC) has performed a collection that finalizes the task [1][2]. Crucially, this event is not guaranteed to run before the process exits [3]. Because it relies on the GC, if the application terminates before a garbage collection occurs, the event will never be raised [1][3]. Consequently, you cannot rely on this event as a robust mechanism for logging or handling exceptions in fire-and-forget tasks [1][2]. In modern.NET (including WPF applications), the recommended practice is to explicitly observe all tasks, even those intended as fire-and-forget, by attaching a continuation (e.g., ContinueWith) or using an asynchronous wrapper that handles exceptions, such as a try-catch block inside the task itself [2][4]. Relying on UnobservedTaskException is discouraged because its timing is nondeterministic and dependent on GC behavior [1][5].
Citations:
Don’t rely on
TaskScheduler.UnobservedTaskExceptionfor pipe-listener failures (SysManager/SysManager/App.xaml.cslines 81-84).StartPipeListenerAsync()is started fire-and-forget (_ = ...), so any exception escaping the listener loop is surfaced only when the faulted Task is later garbage-collected; this timing is nondeterministic and may not occur before process exit. Catch/log insideStartPipeListenerAsyncor attach an explicit fault-only continuation at the call site (instead of relying onUnobservedTaskException).💡 One minimal fix
📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents