Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fix: critical and high-priority audit fixes (P0+P1) for 1.18.1 #614
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
fix: critical and high-priority audit fixes (P0+P1) for 1.18.1 #614
Changes from all commits
f31186ba3f9763File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Generic catch clause Note
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Generic catch clause Note
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don’t preflight with
File.Existshere.Line 33 can silently collapse read failures into “missing file.”
DnsHostsViewModel.LoadHostsAsyncexplicitly handlesUnauthorizedAccessException/IOException, butFile.Exists(HostsPath)returnsfalsefor some access/path errors, so the UI can incorrectly reportLoaded 0 entries.instead of surfacing the failure.Treat only
FileNotFoundException/DirectoryNotFoundExceptionas the empty-list case and let real read errors propagate.Suggested fix
public async Task<List<HostsEntry>> ReadHostsAsync(CancellationToken ct = default) { List<HostsEntry> entries = []; - if (!File.Exists(HostsPath)) return entries; - - var lines = await File.ReadAllLinesAsync(HostsPath, ct).ConfigureAwait(false); + string[] lines; + try + { + lines = await File.ReadAllLinesAsync(HostsPath, ct).ConfigureAwait(false); + } + catch (FileNotFoundException) + { + return entries; + } + catch (DirectoryNotFoundException) + { + return entries; + } + foreach (string rawLine in lines) { string line = rawLine.Trim();📝 Committable suggestion
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Missed opportunity to use Select Note
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clear cache must also reset FIFO queue state.
After adding
_insertionOrder,ClearCache()(Line 157) only clears_cache. That leaves stale keys in the queue, which can grow unbounded across clears and force extra stale dequeues during later evictions.🔧 Proposed fix
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Check notice
Code scanning / CodeQL
Generic catch clause Note
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.