Skip to content

Fix maximize_likelihood in HeterodynedTransientLikelihoodFD#220

Merged
kazewong merged 3 commits into
kazewong:jim-devfrom
thomasckng:fix-opt-maxL
May 15, 2025
Merged

Fix maximize_likelihood in HeterodynedTransientLikelihoodFD#220
kazewong merged 3 commits into
kazewong:jim-devfrom
thomasckng:fix-opt-maxL

Conversation

@thomasckng

@thomasckng thomasckng commented May 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This PR depends on kazewong/flowMC#229.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved selection of best-fit parameters to ensure results correspond to the highest likelihood.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The change updates the maximize_likelihood method in the HeterodynedTransientLikelihoodFD class to handle an additional return value (log_prob) from the optimizer.optimize call. It now selects the best-fit parameters based on the minimum log_prob, ensuring the returned parameters correspond to the highest likelihood.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
src/jimgw/single_event/likelihood.py Modified maximize_likelihood to unpack a third return value (log_prob) from optimizer.optimize, and updated the selection of best-fit parameters to use the minimum log_prob index.

Poem

In the land of likelihood, numbers dance and play,
Now with log_prob guiding, we find the brightest ray.
The optimizer whispers, “Choose the best you see!”
With three gifts returned, the answer’s clear to me.
🥕 Hopping to the minimum, our rabbit finds the peak,
Where the fit is strongest, and the result unique!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Cache: Disabled due to data retention organization setting
Knowledge Base: Disabled due to data retention organization setting

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 05143c1 and d03e70b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/jimgw/single_event/likelihood.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/jimgw/single_event/likelihood.py (1)

524-528: Improved parameter selection criteria - Good enhancement!

The change properly handles the additional return value (log_prob) from the optimizer and selects the best parameter set by choosing the one with the minimum log probability (maximum likelihood). This is a solid improvement over the previous implementation where parameter selection criteria wasn't clear.

The code now:

  1. Unpacks three values from the optimizer instead of two
  2. Uses jnp.argmin(log_prob) to identify the best parameter set
  3. Returns parameters associated with the highest likelihood
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@thomasckng thomasckng changed the base branch from main to jim-dev May 14, 2025 02:17
@thomasckng thomasckng requested a review from kazewong May 15, 2025 07:39
@thomasckng thomasckng marked this pull request as ready for review May 15, 2025 07:39
@thomasckng thomasckng added the bug Something isn't working label May 15, 2025
@thomasckng

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented May 15, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@thomasckng thomasckng self-assigned this May 15, 2025
@kazewong kazewong merged commit f10a9df into kazewong:jim-dev May 15, 2025
1 of 5 checks passed
@thomasckng thomasckng deleted the fix-opt-maxL branch June 18, 2025 06:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants