Skip to content

Added release.json generation to builds#2

Merged
tuj merged 39 commits intofeature/3x-github-packagesfrom
feature/release-json
Apr 13, 2026
Merged

Added release.json generation to builds#2
tuj merged 39 commits intofeature/3x-github-packagesfrom
feature/release-json

Conversation

@tuj
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@tuj tuj commented Mar 30, 2026

@tuj tuj self-assigned this Mar 30, 2026
@tuj tuj added the bug Something isn't working label Mar 30, 2026
@tuj tuj requested review from cableman and turegjorup March 30, 2026 10:55
@tuj tuj marked this pull request as ready for review March 30, 2026 11:32

- name: Create release file
run: |
printf "{\n \"releaseTimestamp\": $(date +%s),\n \"releaseTime\": \"$(date)\",\n \"releaseVersion\": \"${{ github.ref_name }}\"\n}" > public/release.json
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should run name: Set release timestamp first, then use those values here. Otherwise we get slightly different timestamps.


ARG APP_VERSION="develop"
ARG APP_RELEASE_TIMESTAMP=0
ARG APP_RELEASE_TIME=""
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we do default values similar to

      --build-arg APP_RELEASE_TIME="$(date)" \
      --build-arg APP_RELEASE_TIMESTAMP="$(date +%s)" \

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@tuj tuj Apr 8, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ARG will not execute $(date), it will just be interpreted as a string.
So will stick to existing code...

@tuj tuj requested a review from turegjorup April 8, 2026 10:54
tuj and others added 17 commits April 10, 2026 17:47
…collections

Set fetch: extra lazy on all collections doctrine associations
…splay-api-service into feature/list-optimizations
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Inner promises in the onClick chain were not returned, so rejections
from getAllScreenGroupCampaigns, getAllPages (screen campaigns), or
getAllCampaigns never reached the outer .catch() handler — leaving the
button stuck in a loading state permanently on network errors.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
…tions-checksum-listener-test

Fixed relations checksum test
@tuj tuj merged commit 69dea00 into feature/3x-github-packages Apr 13, 2026
16 checks passed
@tuj tuj deleted the feature/release-json branch April 13, 2026 14:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants