Test: add unit tests for ActivityLog entity (constructor and prePersist)

[TatjanaTrajkovic]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Added test coverage for the ActivityLog entity, validating constructor initialization and all relevant getters.
  • Added tests for lifecycle behavior to verify creation timestamps are set and fall within expected time bounds when the entity is persisted.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 0e936ccc-0a84-42d9-928c-76ce16bd99de

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6958c78 and dc6e116.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/test/java/org/example/vet1177/entities/ActivityLogTest.java

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• src/test/java/org/example/vet1177/entities/ActivityLogTest.java

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Added a JUnit 5 test class ActivityLogTest that verifies the ActivityLog constructor/getters and that onCreate() (JPA @PrePersist) sets createdAt within an expected time window.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
ActivityLog Test Suite src/test/java/org/example/vet1177/entities/ActivityLogTest.java	New test class with two tests: constructor/getter assertions using mocked User/MedicalRecord, and onCreate() timestamp verification for createdAt.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Add Entities ActivityLog, enum ActivityType, Deletes CaseStatatus no usage, ActivityLogRepository and ActivityLogService #34: Introduced the ActivityLog entity that this test validates.

Suggested reviewers

• johanbriger
• annikaholmqvist94
• lindaeskilsson

Poem

🐰 I hopped in code to run a test,

Checked the getters, then the timestamp's nest,
CreatedAt set within the span,
ActivityLog passed — that's my plan! 🥕

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	Write docstrings for the functions missing them to satisfy the coverage threshold.

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: adding unit tests for the ActivityLog entity covering constructor and prePersist lifecycle methods.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch test/unit_tests_activity_log_entity

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@src/test/java/org/example/vet1177/entities/ActivityLogTest.java`:
- Around line 47-54: The test's timestamp assertion is too broad; update
ActivityLogTest to capture Instant before = Instant.now() immediately before
calling log.onCreate(), then call log.onCreate(), capture Instant after =
Instant.now() immediately after, and replace the loose isBefore check with
assertions that log.getCreatedAt() is not null and that createdAt is
!before.isAfter(createdAt) (i.e., createdAt.compareTo(before) >= 0) and
!after.isBefore(createdAt) (i.e., createdAt.compareTo(after) <= 0) so createdAt
falls between the before and after timestamps; reference the test method that
calls log.onCreate() and uses log.getCreatedAt().

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: e7d9be63-ce60-4735-84af-a423d99d352d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1cf45a8 and 6958c78.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/test/java/org/example/vet1177/entities/ActivityLogTest.java