Skip to content

FE-225: Update Petrinaut UI#8472

Draft
kube wants to merge 55 commits intocf/h-5839-create-an-lsp-and-re-use-in-monaco-editorfrom
cf/fe-225-migrate-petrinaut-to-figma-designs
Draft

FE-225: Update Petrinaut UI#8472
kube wants to merge 55 commits intocf/h-5839-create-an-lsp-and-re-use-in-monaco-editorfrom
cf/fe-225-migrate-petrinaut-to-figma-designs

Conversation

@kube
Copy link
Collaborator

@kube kube commented Feb 23, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

  • ...

🚫 Blocked by

  • ...

🔍 What does this change?

  • ...

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

  • does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing
  • modifies an npm-publishable library and I have added a changeset file(s)
  • modifies a Cargo-publishable library and I have amended the version
  • modifies a Cargo-publishable library, but it is not yet ready to publish
  • modifies a block that will need publishing via GitHub action once merged
  • I am unsure / need advice

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

  • are internal and do not require a docs change
  • are in a state where docs changes are not yet required but will be
  • require changes to docs which are made as part of this PR
  • require changes to docs which are not made in this PR
    • Provide more detail here
  • I am unsure / need advice

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

  • do not affect the execution graph
  • affected the execution graph, and the turbo.json's have been updated to reflect this
  • I am unsure / need advice

⚠️ Known issues

🐾 Next steps

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

  1. Checkout the branch / view the deployment
  2. Try X
  3. Confirm that Y

📹 Demo

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 23, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hash Error Error Feb 27, 2026 0:16am
petrinaut Ready Ready Preview Feb 27, 2026 0:16am
2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign Ignored Ignored Preview Feb 27, 2026 0:16am
hashdotdesign-tokens Ignored Ignored Preview Feb 27, 2026 0:16am

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 23, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
petrinaut Building Building Preview Feb 23, 2026 3:34pm

Copy link
Collaborator Author

kube commented Feb 23, 2026

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

overlay.style.inset = "0";
overlay.style.zIndex = "99999";
overlay.style.cursor = getCursor(direction);
overlay.style.userSelect = "none";

Check warning

Code scanning / Semgrep PRO

Semgrep Finding: ajinabraham.njsscan.generic.hardcoded_secrets.node_username

A hardcoded username in plain text is identified. Store it properly in an environment variable.
kube and others added 23 commits February 27, 2026 00:32
… and consistency

- Increased header height in VerticalSubViewsContainer from 28px to 44px.
- Adjusted styles for resize handle and header row to enhance visual alignment.
- Removed unnecessary padding from LeftSideBar and PropertiesPanel for a cleaner layout.
…nels

All properties panels now use VerticalSubViewsContainer with a main
subview that displays the title in a fixed header with an actions slot.
Transition properties are split into separate firing time and results
subviews. Separator styling uses data-separator attributes per the
react-resizable-panels docs.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ll remaining space

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Tooltips were hidden behind other panes because they rendered inside
overflow:hidden panel containers. Portal them into the .petrinaut-root
element so they escape panel overflow while staying inside the Panda
CSS variable scope.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add ScrollableContent wrapper with gradient shadows that fade in
  when content overflows top or bottom
- Use cva for shadow styles with position/visible variants
- Move separator border from bottom to top so it visually sits on the
  previous section
- Use neutral.a30 (alpha) instead of neutral.s30 for transparency

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…ics to playback

- Combine Select and Pan mode buttons into a single dropdown button
  with a chevron indicator, using Ark UI Menu
- Move toggle panel and diagnostics indicator from the edition segment
  to the playback segment
- Place cursor mode dropdown first with a divider before add buttons

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…odes

- Extract all visualizer logic from PlaceMainContent into a dedicated
  place-visualizer SubView with toggle, code editor, and preview
- Add OutlinedSegmentGroup for Code | Preview | Split view modes
- Auto-switch to Preview and hide SegmentGroup during simulation
- Show explanatory message when visualizer is disabled
- Always include the visualizer SubView in the panel layout

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adds a vertical button stack at the bottom-right of the canvas with zoom
in/out, fullscreen (collapses all panels), lock view (placeholder), and
a settings dropdown. The controls offset dynamically based on the
properties panel and bottom panel visibility. Also adds a placement prop
to the Tooltip and Menu components.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
… and size variants

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@kube kube force-pushed the cf/fe-225-migrate-petrinaut-to-figma-designs branch from 4049210 to dcf28a8 Compare February 27, 2026 00:03
@kube kube force-pushed the graphite-base/8472 branch from 07681b9 to d86a788 Compare February 27, 2026 00:03
@kube kube changed the base branch from graphite-base/8472 to cf/h-5839-create-an-lsp-and-re-use-in-monaco-editor February 27, 2026 00:03
@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 68 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run1


Comparing cf/fe-225-migrate-petrinaut-to-figma-designs (dcf28a8) with main (e957752)2

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them.

  2. No successful run was found on cf/h-5839-create-an-lsp-and-re-use-in-monaco-editor (d86a788) during the generation of this report, so main (e957752) was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002 $$28.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 195 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.022 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001 $$13.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.762 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314 $$45.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 332 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.206 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$15.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.356 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526 $$25.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 193 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.772 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078 $$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.315 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$4.02 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033 $$14.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 123 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.890 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102 $$4.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.27 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.23 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.03 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51 $$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269 $$5.48 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.003 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.82 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.603 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107 $$4.36 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.711 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133 $$4.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.284 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.71 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.867 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63 $$4.43 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.529 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2 $$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.382 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.20 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1 $$3.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.839 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8 $$3.28 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.015 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.08 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.326 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3 $$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.051 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52 $$3.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.06 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.56 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25 $$3.22 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94 $$3.81 \mathrm{ms} \pm 26.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26 $$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.88 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66 $$3.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1 $$3.45 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29 $$3.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}8.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth 1 entities $$43.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.289 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 10 entities $$80.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 468 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.968 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 25 entities $$47.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 216 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.919 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 5 entities $$49.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 270 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.086 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth 50 entities $$57.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 330 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.623 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 1 entities $$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.216 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 10 entities $$423 \mathrm{ms} \pm 854 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.366 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 25 entities $$99.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 558 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.222 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 5 entities $$89.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 446 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.269 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth 50 entities $$332 \mathrm{ms} \pm 990 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 1 entities $$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.02 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 10 entities $$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 25 entities $$17.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 103 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 5 entities $$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.08 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth 50 entities $$21.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 101 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id 1 entities $$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 105 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.07 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10 entities $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 137 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.19 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 100 entities $$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 113 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.282 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 1000 entities $$17.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 129 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.68 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id 10000 entities $$24.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 176 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1 $$31.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 318 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1 $$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 306 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.207 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1 $$32.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 283 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.83 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1 $$31.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 317 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2 $$31.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 333 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1 $$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 296 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.435 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1 $$32.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 319 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.48 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1 $$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 252 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.617 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
entity_by_id entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1 $$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 336 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.57 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba $$8.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 43.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.740 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
entity_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$91.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 469 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$146 \mathrm{ms} \pm 550 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.547 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$101 \mathrm{ms} \pm 505 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.458 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$110 \mathrm{ms} \pm 541 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.742 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 633 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.417 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 642 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.727 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=0 0 $$90.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 390 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.473 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=255 1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true $$119 \mathrm{ms} \pm 441 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.241 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false $$96.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 430 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.450 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 537 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.702 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 524 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.175 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property traversal_paths=2 1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true $$109 \mathrm{ms} \pm 440 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.517 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function Value Mean Flame graphs
full_test query-limited $$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 520 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}7.94 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
full_test query-unlimited $$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 549 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-limited $$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 631 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.487 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph
linked_queries query-unlimited $$592 \mathrm{ms} \pm 2.73 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.655 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$ Flame Graph

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

area/apps > hash.design Affects the `hash.design` design site (app) area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > frontend Owned by the @frontend team

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant