Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR localizes repository documentation from Japanese to English across Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📝 Coding Plan
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
dev-docs/architecture/pipeline.md (1)
44-49: Consider removing duplicated RichBackend clarification text.The same conceptual-vs-concrete explanation appears on Line 44 and again on Line 48. Keeping it once will improve readability.
✂️ Proposed doc cleanup
-3. **Rich Backend** extracts shapes/charts if available. Here, `RichBackend` is the conceptual layer and `ComRichBackend` / `LibreOfficeRichBackend` are the concrete implementations. +3. **Rich Backend** extracts shapes/charts if available.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@dev-docs/architecture/pipeline.md` around lines 44 - 49, The doc duplicates the conceptual-vs-concrete explanation for RichBackend; remove the redundant sentence so the clarification about RichBackend vs its concrete implementations appears only once (keep a single clear mention of RichBackend and its concrete types ComRichBackend and LibreOfficeRichBackend), ensuring references to RichBackend, ComRichBackend, and LibreOfficeRichBackend remain present in the retained sentence and adjusting surrounding numbering/flow so the list remains contiguous.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In `@dev-docs/architecture/pipeline.md`:
- Around line 44-49: The doc duplicates the conceptual-vs-concrete explanation
for RichBackend; remove the redundant sentence so the clarification about
RichBackend vs its concrete implementations appears only once (keep a single
clear mention of RichBackend and its concrete types ComRichBackend and
LibreOfficeRichBackend), ensuring references to RichBackend, ComRichBackend, and
LibreOfficeRichBackend remain present in the retained sentence and adjusting
surrounding numbering/flow so the list remains contiguous.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 197d72a9-c48f-41fd-a53a-954011553f47
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
dev-docs/architecture/pipeline.mddev-docs/testing/test-requirements.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- dev-docs/testing/test-requirements.md
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
AGENTS.mdinto Englishdev-docs/into EnglishVerification
uv run task precommit-runAGENTS.mddev-docs/**/*.{md,yaml,yml}Notes
uv run task test-unitfailed during collection in this environment becauseanyiois missing from the active uv environment, even though it exists inuv.lock.Closes #98
Summary by CodeRabbit