π‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix authorization bypass in JWT validation#579
π‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix authorization bypass in JWT validation#579mudcube wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: mudcube <101564+mudcube@users.noreply.github.com>
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Deploying typemill with Β
|
| Latest commit: |
a1f4161
|
| Status: | Β β Β Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://95236a07.typemill.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://sentinel-jwt-auth-bypass-850.typemill.pages.dev |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
π‘ Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: a1f4161c1d
βΉοΈ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with π.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| Err(MillError::permission_denied( | ||
| "JWT token missing project_id claim".to_string(), | ||
| )) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Enforce project claims on the websocket auth path
This fail-closed branch does not protect the production websocket authentication path: rg validate_token_with_project shows no production callers, while crates/mill-transport/src/ws.rs:208-220 still decodes JWTs directly and returns Ok(response) after only warning when project_id is absent; handle_initialize then accepts the client-supplied project at ws.rs:459-460. In deployments using websocket auth, a valid unscoped token can therefore still connect and choose any project despite this helper rejecting the same token in tests.
Useful? React with πΒ / π.
π¨ Severity: HIGH
π‘ Vulnerability: The
validate_token_with_projectfunction inmill-authfailed open when theproject_idclaim was missing from the JWT token, returning success to maintain backward compatibility. This could allow tokens without project scoping to bypass project-specific authorization checks.π― Impact: An attacker with a valid but unscoped JWT could potentially access project-specific resources they should not have access to, bypassing multi-tenant isolation.
π§ Fix: Updated
validate_token_with_projectto fail closed by explicitly returning aMillError::permission_deniederror if the expectedproject_idclaim is missing from the token. Added explicit security comments explaining the change.β Verification: Run
cargo test -p mill-authto ensuretest_validate_token_with_project_no_claimnow asserts that validation fails when the claim is missing. Tested withcargo clippyandcargo fmt.PR created automatically by Jules for task 8504323169223189950 started by @mudcube