Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix authorization bypass in JWT validation#579

Open
mudcube wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/jwt-auth-bypass-8504323169223189950
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [HIGH] Fix authorization bypass in JWT validation#579
mudcube wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/jwt-auth-bypass-8504323169223189950

Conversation

@mudcube

@mudcube mudcube commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

🚨 Severity: HIGH
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: The validate_token_with_project function in mill-auth failed open when the project_id claim was missing from the JWT token, returning success to maintain backward compatibility. This could allow tokens without project scoping to bypass project-specific authorization checks.
🎯 Impact: An attacker with a valid but unscoped JWT could potentially access project-specific resources they should not have access to, bypassing multi-tenant isolation.
πŸ”§ Fix: Updated validate_token_with_project to fail closed by explicitly returning a MillError::permission_denied error if the expected project_id claim is missing from the token. Added explicit security comments explaining the change.
βœ… Verification: Run cargo test -p mill-auth to ensure test_validate_token_with_project_no_claim now asserts that validation fails when the claim is missing. Tested with cargo clippy and cargo fmt.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8504323169223189950 started by @mudcube

Co-authored-by: mudcube <101564+mudcube@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Deploying typemill with Β Cloudflare Pages Β Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: a1f4161
Status:Β βœ…Β  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://95236a07.typemill.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://sentinel-jwt-auth-bypass-850.typemill.pages.dev

View logs

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

πŸ’‘ Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: a1f4161c1d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with πŸ‘.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +89 to +91
Err(MillError::permission_denied(
"JWT token missing project_id claim".to_string(),
))

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Enforce project claims on the websocket auth path

This fail-closed branch does not protect the production websocket authentication path: rg validate_token_with_project shows no production callers, while crates/mill-transport/src/ws.rs:208-220 still decodes JWTs directly and returns Ok(response) after only warning when project_id is absent; handle_initialize then accepts the client-supplied project at ws.rs:459-460. In deployments using websocket auth, a valid unscoped token can therefore still connect and choose any project despite this helper rejecting the same token in tests.

Useful? React with πŸ‘Β / πŸ‘Ž.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant