Skip to content

fix(ci): replace sergeysova/jq-action@v2 with inline jq#211

Merged
jbiskur merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/replace-jq-action-with-inline-jq
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

fix(ci): replace sergeysova/jq-action@v2 with inline jq#211
jbiskur merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/replace-jq-action-with-inline-jq

Conversation

@jbiskur
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jbiskur jbiskur commented Apr 15, 2026

Summary

  • sergeysova/jq-action@v2 uses alpine:3.11 as its Docker base, and the Alpine 3.11 mirrors started returning network errors between 2026-04-14 and 2026-04-15, breaking every workflow run that used this action.
  • All three workflows (build.yml, validate.yml, release-please.yml) use the action only to read one field out of deno.json. Replace it with a plain jq call captured into GITHUB_OUTPUT. jq is available by default on the blacksmith-4vcpu-ubuntu-2204 runners, so no extra setup.
  • This unblocks the release PR chore(main): release 3.1.0 #210 (v3.1.0 for the new PolicyValidateCommand) which is currently failing its Test workflow on the same broken step.

Test plan

  • CI validate workflow green on this branch
  • After merge, release-please refreshes PR chore(main): release 3.1.0 #210 and its Test workflow passes
  • v3.1.0 publishes successfully

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

sergeysova/jq-action@v2 uses alpine:3.11 as a base image, and Alpine
3.11 mirrors started returning network errors sometime after
2026-04-14, causing the in-action Docker build to fail consistently
on every workflow run. All three workflows use this action only to
extract a field from deno.json, so replace it with a plain jq call
captured into GITHUB_OUTPUT. jq is available by default on the
blacksmith-4vcpu-ubuntu-2204 runners.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 15, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@jbiskur has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 55 minutes and 12 seconds before requesting another review.

Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 55 minutes and 12 seconds.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: f0fc1f0c-6ddd-415f-81c9-9567666e074f

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e9062ba and 90e2d0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml
  • .github/workflows/release-please.yml
  • .github/workflows/validate.yml
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch fix/replace-jq-action-with-inline-jq

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@jbiskur jbiskur merged commit 63ee739 into main Apr 15, 2026
2 checks passed
@jbiskur jbiskur deleted the fix/replace-jq-action-with-inline-jq branch April 15, 2026 10:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant