fix(ci): replace sergeysova/jq-action@v2 with inline jq#211
Conversation
sergeysova/jq-action@v2 uses alpine:3.11 as a base image, and Alpine 3.11 mirrors started returning network errors sometime after 2026-04-14, causing the in-action Docker build to fail consistently on every workflow run. All three workflows use this action only to extract a field from deno.json, so replace it with a plain jq call captured into GITHUB_OUTPUT. jq is available by default on the blacksmith-4vcpu-ubuntu-2204 runners. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 55 minutes and 12 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary
sergeysova/jq-action@v2usesalpine:3.11as its Docker base, and the Alpine 3.11 mirrors started returning network errors between 2026-04-14 and 2026-04-15, breaking every workflow run that used this action.build.yml,validate.yml,release-please.yml) use the action only to read one field out ofdeno.json. Replace it with a plainjqcall captured intoGITHUB_OUTPUT.jqis available by default on the blacksmith-4vcpu-ubuntu-2204 runners, so no extra setup.PolicyValidateCommand) which is currently failing its Test workflow on the same broken step.Test plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code