Exclusion in POM dependency

[marcelstoer]

IMO it'd be wise to instruct users to exclude any io.dropwizard dependencies from the io.federecio:dropwizard-swagger dependency because they have an explicit non-transitive Dropwizard dependency anyway. That way one can avoid clashes between different versions.

[federecio]

Yeah. At one point I had all dropwizard dependencies with "provided" because most likely the user will explicitly declare DW dependencies. I don't remember why I changed that.

Asking the users to exclude transitive DW dependencies when using this project seems a bit awkward. Maybe we should just mark DW dependencies with "provided" scope.

What do you think?

[marcelstoer]

Asking the users to exclude transitive DW dependencies when using this project seems a bit awkward. Maybe we should just mark DW dependencies with "provided" scope.

Yes, thought about that, too. Just don't know if that'd make development more cumbersome for you. Don't think so, though.

[chmodas]

@federecio, as the shade plugin still throws warnings, should we revisit this "poll". I wouldn't mind doing the work myself and I most definitely vote in favor of having the DW dependencies provided.

[salimane]

👍

[jplock]

I don't think this version is being maintained any longer. I've forked this version and started pushing builds to maven central at https://github.com/smoketurner/dropwizard-swagger