Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Hmm, I've been meaning to get back into this. I should honestly just re-write it :-| Lets see if I can find time. I think with the new stuff on the web now this can probably be a full on web app with some really nice features. That being said I constantly go back and forth on whether I should re-write this or just incorporate it into chrome dev-tools. 😢 I can't pick. |
Owner
|
I did some testing today and I might be able to create a much cleaner har-viewer piggy backing on all the work the DevTool team did. It's a much decouple/browser compatible tool now. Also I was thinking more of a https://github.com/ChromeDevTools/timeline-viewer so har-viewer with the same kind of idea. This will resolve all the open issues and new features I wanted to add. hmmm. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I wrote this patch a year ago. It's not very good quality, but I think it worked.
Fiddler was missing the page entry.
I would not merge this PR directly, but if someone is trying to fix chromeHAR to make it great again... then this should probably fall into scope. :)