Open
Conversation
qwriter
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2025
Contributor
qwriter
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I only had several nits. The organization makes excellent sense.
ehoskinson
approved these changes
Dec 19, 2025
JoelPasvolsky
commented
Dec 20, 2025
docs/requirements.txt
Outdated
| reno[sphinx]==3.3.0 | ||
| numpy~=2.0 | ||
|
|
||
| dwave-experimental |
Collaborator
Author
5663c51 to
30126a7
Compare
4ccf305 to
b77730c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Will also create a PR for
dwave-experimentaldocstrings, which currently fail doctest, and then I'll update the "dwave-experimental Utilities" section properly.Note that the technical content is already approved, this PR just moves it into the standard docs, formats appropriately to the surrounding content, and adds
dwave-experimentaldocumentation.