Skip to content

docs: comprehensive Squad troubleshooting guide#76

Closed
diberry wants to merge 6 commits intodevfrom
squad/nap-troubleshooting-guide
Closed

docs: comprehensive Squad troubleshooting guide#76
diberry wants to merge 6 commits intodevfrom
squad/nap-troubleshooting-guide

Conversation

@diberry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@diberry diberry commented Mar 28, 2026

Troubleshooting guide for squad nap — covers all 5 nap operations, common problems, thresholds, and diagnostic script.

Includes cross-platform (bash/PowerShell) commands for Windows and Unix-like systems.

Added to docs/src/navigation.ts in Scenarios section.

Copilot bot added 6 commits March 27, 2026 13:40
Fork-specific workflow skills for PR hygiene:
- fork-first-pipeline: review on fork before opening upstream PRs
- bleed-check: twice-daily cross-branch audit for stowaway files

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Adds Step 5.5 REBASE with guidance on rebasing feature branches against origin/dev to avoid full-file rewrites on shared files. Includes Shared File Strategy for surgical additions and When Rebase Fails recovery steps. Updates anti-patterns table to flag 'Skip rebase before upstream'.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…, conventions)

- Fork-first-pipeline: Added serial branch operations warning, force-add note for gitignored skills, stale comments check
- Bleed-check: Added high-risk shared files callout, convention gate checks, CI path debugging pattern

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
- Dual Reviewer Gate: both Flight and FIDO must approve
- Convention Issues Are Blockers: /docs/ prefix, double blanks, table order, whitespace
- Review→Fix→Re-review Loop: both reviewers must re-review after fixes
- Reviewer Lockout: locked authors cannot self-fix after rejection
- Known PAO Quirks: watch for .squad/ files, /docs/ prefix, verification before push
- Review Comments: formal PR comment format and verdict options
- Tamir Reviewer Rule: only on upstream PRs with source material
- Commit Hygiene: one commit, amend fixups, force-push safely, verify before push

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
When a PR completes the full fork pipeline (Flight+FIDO approved, bleed check passed, squashed, rebased, moved to upstream targeting Brady's dev), the upstream PR should be undrafted immediately.

The upstream PR is the final presentation — draft PRs signal incomplete work, but at this stage all iteration is finished on the fork.

Add gh pr ready command to Step 7 (UPSTREAM) as the final action after opening the upstream PR.

Add anti-pattern entry for leaving upstream PRs in draft.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
- Renamed nap-troubleshooting.md to squad-troubleshooting.md
- Expanded with sections: Squad Init, Casting, Agent Spawning, CI/CD, Decisions & History
- Added Quick Fixes table for common 1-line solutions
- Updated navigation to reflect comprehensive guide
- Kept existing nap content as dedicated section
- Maintained cross-platform bash/PowerShell examples throughout

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@diberry diberry force-pushed the squad/nap-troubleshooting-guide branch from e687ced to a84eec0 Compare March 28, 2026 12:34
@diberry diberry changed the title docs: nap troubleshooting guide docs: comprehensive Squad troubleshooting guide Mar 28, 2026
@diberry diberry added squad:pr-needs-review PR lifecycle: awaiting team review and removed squad:pr-needs-review PR lifecycle: awaiting team review labels Mar 31, 2026
@diberry
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

diberry commented Apr 1, 2026

Closing: Upstream already has troubleshooting.md. Verified against bradygaster/squad dev + main on 2026-04-01.

@diberry diberry closed this Apr 1, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant