Flutter 3.14.4, AGP 8, Dart 3, sensors_plus: ^3.0.3#29
Conversation
|
Hi Philipp, Thanks so much for the PR. My apologies for this repository being unmaintained for a bit, I was dealing with a few personal issues. I will have this PR reviewed and the new version launched by tomorrow. Thanks so much for the contribution and I'll do more to support the repo going ahead. |
|
Np. When reviewing, checking the lowest flutter version you want to support makes the most sense (if u had to pick one), but take your time (esp with personal issues!) |
|
Hi @deven98, if you need any help maintaining the repo you can add me as a contributor. |
|
@deven98 can you perhaps bump to sensors_plus to 4? So we can use flutter 3.16 |
|
@deven98 I've submitted a PR for you, that enables support for 3.16 flutter version by supporting sensors_plus v4: |
|
@simplenotezy I just built our project with Flutter 3.16.2 & the current state of the PR (ie sensors_plus v3.0.3) and everything seems to build & run just fine. In what way was v3 incompatible with Flutter 3.16? Which 3.16.x did you use? |
|
Hello, @deven98! Any news with reviewing this one? Or maybe you need help with reviewing it? |
|
Hi @deven98. Kindly pinging to remind that the users of this package still wait for a new version to come in. Do you need any help with updating the package? |
|
Hi @deven98, are there any plans on merging this at some point? Is there some way to assist you? |
|
Due to the old version of The solution is to upgrade the |
|
You can just add ShakeDetector class in your app codebase. This package is just a single class. |
|
@FeodorFitsner I saw that too, but with |
|
Will take a look at |
|
Scratch that - it's for haptic feedback 🫣 |
|
New updated version is now out - thanks for all the contributions :) |
Essentially this PR combines the open version-update PRs into one and adds some general maintenance on top.
androidfolder to shut up the linter about deprecated embeddingflutter_lintssensors_plus: ^3.0.3feat(2.3.0): updatesensors_plusversion #27sensors_plusversion #27 doesn't have that because upper limit too low)@ziqq I know it's a waste to essentially recreate your PR, but we need a stable fork that we can rely on anyway, so here it is.
@deven98 Do you plan on reviewing the open PRs anytime soon?