Add blacklist_validation_status field to UserUpdateRequest model

[gmorales96]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features
  • Added an optional blacklist validation status parameter to user update requests, allowing clients to submit and manage a user's blacklist verification state as part of update flows.
  • Improves flexibility in handling user verification and reconciliation processes without affecting existing fields or flows.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Added an import of VerificationStatus and a new optional field blacklist_validation_status: Optional[VerificationStatus] = None to the UserUpdateRequest model in cuenca_validations/types/requests.py. Bumped module version in cuenca_validations/version.py from '2.1.23' to '2.1.24'.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Update phone and email internal #391 — Adds optional fields to the same UserUpdateRequest model (related datamodel extension).
• version #383 — Modifies UserUpdateRequest and updates enum imports similarly.

Suggested reviewers

• felipao-mx

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The PR title accurately describes the main change: adding a new blacklist_validation_status field to the UserUpdateRequest model, which is the primary alteration in this changeset.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbb6960 and a3b76e9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• cuenca_validations/version.py

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• cuenca_validations/version.py

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (45ab309) to head (a3b76e9).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #395   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           16        16           
  Lines         1417      1418    +1     
=========================================
+ Hits          1417      1418    +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
cuenca_validations/types/requests.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
cuenca_validations/version.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 45ab309...a3b76e9. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.