Llms txt

[abrulic]

Fixes #3

Note

Base branch is generate-documentation

Screenshots

From test repository docs-template-example

From this repository docs-template

[github-actions]

Coverage Report

Status	Category	Percentage	Covered / Total
🔵	Lines	95.66%	331 / 346
🔵	Statements	95.66%	331 / 346
🔵	Functions	78.57%	33 / 42
🔵	Branches	98.94%	94 / 95

File Coverage

No changed files found.

Generated in workflow #34 for commit efedf80 by the Vitest Coverage Report Action

[thomasfr]

Very cool! Format looks good.
How would that work with different versions? Wouldn't it be better to generate this text file during the build of and for the specific version, so that you have both text files available for each generated doc version?

[abrulic]

Very cool! Format looks good. How would that work with different versions? Wouldn't it be better to generate this text file during the build of and for the specific version, so that you have both text files available for each generated doc version?

Do you mean that I should get the version from the URL so that we have e.g domain.com/v3.0.0/llms.txt?

[thomasfr]

Very cool! Format looks good. How would that work with different versions? Wouldn't it be better to generate this text file during the build of and for the specific version, so that you have both text files available for each generated doc version?

Do you mean that I should get the version from the URL so that we have e.g domain.com/v3.0.0/llms.txt?

Yeah, i think every version should have its own and maybe the root /llms.txt should then point to the latest version. What do you think?

[abrulic]

Very cool! Format looks good. How would that work with different versions? Wouldn't it be better to generate this text file during the build of and for the specific version, so that you have both text files available for each generated doc version?

Do you mean that I should get the version from the URL so that we have e.g domain.com/v3.0.0/llms.txt?

Yeah, i think every version should have its own and maybe the root /llms.txt should then point to the latest version. What do you think?

Thanks, great idea. Updated.

[thomasfr]

version vs versions in different file names. Correct would be version-utils but why append utils if its already in an util folder?

[abrulic]

fixed

[thomasfr]

Why append utils if its already in an utils folder

[abrulic]

fixed

[thomasfr]

nope its not fixed

[thomasfr]

nope its not fixed