Add meta-defintions.

[DerSaidin]

Proposal for more adding more information to gismu definitions.

This is just an example.
Probably some stuff could be better, and certainly more stuff could be added.
We would also need more documentation beyond those comments.

[lagleki]

mlismu, not WordNet-like definitions are the answer.

[DerSaidin]

You mean encode the information like this?
https://github.com/timo/mlismu/blob/master/fatci.txt

Can you explain [or link to] some justification for the assertion that mlismu, not WordNet-like definitions are the answer?

1. Why not have both?
   The additional information I'm proposing should be helpful to tools like
   https://github.com/lojban/mlismu/blob/master/mlismu

2. That meta-definitions section would be a good place to put stuff like:
   https://github.com/balningau/gimste/blob/master/gimselpoi.md
   Alternatively, why aren't these encoded as mlismu fatci?

[lagleki]

Not WordNet because hyponyms and hypernyms are particular cases of mlismu.
If mlismu says that {ro mlatu cu danlu} then no need to list {danlu}
manually or even to put it into {see also} field. It can be
extracted/regenerated at any time automatically.
Doing that manually is a waste of time since after the work on mlismu is
fully started those hyper/hyponyms will be self-evident.

2014-11-26 1:21 GMT+03:00 Andrew Browne notifications@github.com:

You mean encode the information like this?
https://github.com/timo/mlismu/blob/master/fatci.txt

Can you explain [or link to] some justification for the assertion that
mlismu, not WordNet-like definitions are the answer?

1. Why not have both?
   The additional information I'm proposing should be helpful to tools like
   https://github.com/lojban/mlismu/blob/master/mlismu

2. That meta-definitions section would be a good place to put stuff like:
   https://github.com/balningau/gimste/blob/master/gimselpoi.md
   Alternatively, why aren't these encoded as mlismu fatci?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#46 (comment).

[DerSaidin]

Ok. It is more general. I agree mlismu fatci is better than hyper/hyponyms.

• should fatci be in this repository?
• what about other information? place structure tags and semantic classification?