by standard / in aspect

[solpahi]

A lot of the "by standard" places should be removed, but a lot of them should be turned into "in aspect" places instead. I'm thinking of things like xamgu3.

In the balningau thread, xorxes listed a bunch of gismu that have "aspects" (sometimes simply called "property") :
"zo mansa .e zo vajni .e zo cfipu .e zo cizra .e zo xajmi .e zo
fange .e zo zdile .e zo trina .e zo .melbi .e zo cnino .e zo slabu .e zo
dicra .e zo zunti cu mintu fi lo ka tersu'i stura .i ku'i ki'u ma zo
cinri .e zo misno .e zo dirba .e zo ckape .e so'o drata na go'i "

Indeed, why don't words like {cinri}, {misno}, {dirba}, {ckape} have the same kind of "in aspect" places? I would much prefer that.

[DerSaidin]

Generally I would agree with removing them.
"relative to" instead of "by standard" might make sense in some cases.

[tsani]

I don't think that changing everything into comparisons in a good idea. If you want a comparison, then just use one (zmadu/mleca). I agree with selpahi that many should simply be removed and that many should be changed to use properties.