-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 595
perf: Optimize metadata records processing in SqlStorageClient
#1551
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
vdusek
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please PR type without an exclamation mark
|
Interesting! I'd imagine that transactions consisting of e.g., an insertion to the dataset_items table and an update to dataset metadata wouldn't lock the metadata table for that long - you can commit right after the update to metadata. Also, the buffering approach is faster because the buffer table gets a row for each increment and those get compacted later on, correct? |
They will create many short-lived locks. And with a large number of clients with high concurrency inserting new records, this effect will accumulate. Although, of course, the strongest impact on RequestQueue Yes, insert operations into the buffer table are quite fast. And then we can simply apply the result of the aggregations to update the metadata record. |
SqlStorageClient
I see, thanks. And is there any chance that the lock is held for too long because of how we work with sqlalchemy? In other words, would it be better if we just executed sql such as |
I will test this approach. |
Unfortunately, switching to queries such as So far, switching to additional tables with on-demand metadata processing has shown the best results. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
This PR optimizes metadata record processing in SqlStorageClient by introducing buffer tables to defer metadata updates and reduce database lock contention in high-concurrency scenarios. Instead of updating metadata instantly within transactions, updates are now accumulated in buffer tables and applied when get_metadata is called.
Changes:
- Added buffer tables (
dataset_metadata_buffer,key_value_store_metadata_buffer,request_queue_metadata_buffer) to accumulate metadata updates - Implemented buffer processing mechanism with locking to prevent concurrent buffer processing
- Increased database connection pool settings to handle higher concurrency
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 13 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| src/crawlee/storage_clients/_sql/_storage_client.py | Removed _accessed_modified_update_interval mechanism; increased connection pool sizes |
| src/crawlee/storage_clients/_sql/_db_models.py | Added buffer table models and buffer_locked_until field to metadata tables; added indexes |
| src/crawlee/storage_clients/_sql/_client_mixin.py | Implemented core buffer processing logic including _add_buffer_record, _process_buffers, and lock management |
| src/crawlee/storage_clients/_sql/_request_queue_client.py | Integrated buffer system; replaced direct metadata updates with buffer records |
| src/crawlee/storage_clients/_sql/_key_value_store_client.py | Integrated buffer system for KVS operations |
| src/crawlee/storage_clients/_sql/_dataset_client.py | Integrated buffer system for dataset operations |
| tests/unit/storage_clients/_sql/test_sql_rq_client.py | Removed test fixtures that modified _accessed_modified_update_interval |
| tests/unit/storage_clients/_sql/test_sql_kvs_client.py | Removed test fixtures that modified _accessed_modified_update_interval |
| tests/unit/storage_clients/_sql/test_sql_dataset_client.py | Removed test fixtures that modified _accessed_modified_update_interval |
| docs/guides/storage_clients.mdx | Updated ER diagrams to include new buffer tables |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull request overview
Copilot reviewed 10 out of 10 changed files in this pull request and generated 11 comments.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/crawlee/storage_clients/_sql/_dataset_client.py:290
- The docstring mentions a
sessionparameter that doesn't exist in the method signature. This appears to be leftover documentation from before the refactoring. The parameter should be removed from the docstring to match the actual method signature.
session: The SQLAlchemy AsyncSession to use for the update.
new_item_count: If provided, set item count to this value.
delta_item_count: If provided, add this value to the current item count.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
So be it 😐
You should be able to set that in connection options if I'm not missing something. |
Description
buffertables to improve handling ofmetadatarecords. The key change is that updates tometadataare now accumulated inbufferand applied whenget_metadatais called. With the old behavior,metadatarecords were updated instantly within a transaction. This led to waiting for locks to be released in high-concurrency situations.Issues