docs: Migrate from npm to yarn and relax web dependencies #756
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
vdusek
force-pushed
the
migrate-docs-to-yarn-2
branch
from
7e13f47 to
2b3938f
Compare
vdusek
force-pushed
the
migrate-docs-to-yarn-2
branch
from
2b3938f to
84c9c1c
Compare
github-actions
bot
added
the
t-tooling
vdusek
added
adhoc
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #756 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 81.91% 81.91%
=======================================
Files 46 46
Lines 2693 2693
=======================================
Hits 2206 2206
Misses 487 487
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was already reviewed in #747 , it is exactly the same code.